Genomic profile of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with MTAP loss.

Authors

Tin-Yun Tang

Tin-Yun Tang

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Tin-Yun Tang , Jeffrey S. Ross , Jordi Rodon Ahnert , Milind M. Javle

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Recent data suggests a role for immune-checkpoint inhibition in the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). Chromosomal 9p21 loss with CDKN2A/MTAP co-deletion commonly occurs in iCCA and may correlate with poor response to immunotherapy. Methods: 2,508 cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma underwent comprehensive genomic profiling with the FoundationOne CDx assay. PD-L1 expression was measured with IHC using the Dako 22C3 antibody and measured with the tumor proportion score (TPS) method. Prevalence of different selected genomic alterations in tumors with MTAP loss was compared against MTAP intact tumors using Fischer’s exact test. Results: In 2,508 cases analyzed, 15.5% of tumors were found to have MTAP loss. Of these, 98.7% had concomitant CDKN2A and 9p21 loss. No significant difference in immune biomarkers in MTAP loss versus wildtype (WT) was seen. PD-L1 low positive at 13.2% vs 19.2%, PD-L1 high positive at 2.9% vs 6.5%, median tumor mutational burden at 2.5 vs 2.5 and MSI high at 0.0% vs 1.6% in MTAP loss vs WT, respectively. There were no significant differences between MTAP loss and WT in potentially actionable mutations including FGFR1/2 mutations (12.4% vs 10.7%), PIK3CA (6.40% vs 6.60%), ERBB2 (4.10% vs 5.30%) and KRAS G12C (1.20% vs 1.10%) in MTAP loss vs WT, respectively. The table depicts significant genomic differences between these subgroups. Conclusions: This represents the largest iCCA cohort with MTAP loss to our knowledge. Given the historical data regarding 9p21 loss and poor response to immunotherapy, efforts targeting MTAP loss through synthetic lethality or other novel combinational therapeutics are justified.

Genomic differences between MTAP WT and loss in iCCA.

MTAP Wildtype
MTAP Loss
P Value (Fischer's exact)
Number of Cases
2119 (84.50%)
389 (15.50%)
CDKN2A
19%
99%
<.0001
TP53
36%
31%
0.07
SMAD4
6%
11%
<.0001
BRAF
5%
9%
0.003
IDH1
15%
7%
<.0001
MYC
0%
5%
<.0001
BRCA2
2%
5%
0.001
TERT
7%
4%
0.03

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Hepatobiliary Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 4102)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.4102

Abstract #

4102

Poster Bd #

89

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Circulating tumor DNA–based genomic landscape of KRAS wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

First Author: Brendon Fusco

First Author: Stephanie Leigh Alden

Abstract

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Impact of PD-L1 expression on conventional urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) genomic alteration (GA) profile.

First Author: Petros Grivas