First-line (1L) treatment patterns in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (pts) who are elderly or have compromised performance status (PS).

Authors

Julia Judd

Julia Judd

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA

Julia Judd , Elizabeth A. Handorf , Brinda Gupta , Martin Joseph Edelman

Organizations

Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Previous studies demonstrated that pts > 80 years (80+), or compromised PS (ECOG PS > 2, PS 2+) are frequently not treated for advanced NSCLC, despite studies demonstrating survival benefit with active therapy. We hypothesized that new therapies (e.g., immunotherapy) have changed practice in these populations. Here, we present new subgroup analysis in pts 80+ or PS2+. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, observational cohort study using the nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record (EHR)-derived de-identified database to describe 1L treatment patterns from 2011 to 2020 in pts with advanced NSCLC. Pts 80+ could only be included from 2015 as the database suppressed birth years prior to 1935 due to privacy protection. Pts were excluded if there was a > 90-day post-diagnosis gap in EHR data. Treatment groups included PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor single agent, chemoimmunotherapy, platinum-based doublet +/- VEGF inhibitors (VEGFi), single agent chemotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze treatment patterns by year, and the relationship between 1L treatments and variables of interest were tested using Cochran-Armitage trend tests. Results: Of 58,145 pts with advanced NSCLC in the database, 6,528 were 80+ (2015+) and 8,611 had PS2+ at diagnosis (2011+). While the proportion of pts who did not receive any documented treatment has decreased for those 80+ (p < 0.0001), the proportion remains the same in pts with PS2+ (p = 0.78; Table). There was rapid uptake of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as well as chemoimmunotherapy upon FDA approvals in 2016 and 2018, respectively. This correlated with a rapid decrease in platinum-doublet chemotherapy +/- VEGFi and single agent chemotherapy use. Single agent immunotherapy was favored in pts 80+ (Table). TKIs accounted for 9-11% of treatment employed in pts 80+ and 6-8% in pts with PS2+, without notable change across the study period. Conclusions: Real world data from 2011 to 2020 demonstrates rapid incorporation of immunotherapy into 1L treatment for NSCLC pts who are 80+ or PS2+. A substantial proportion of pts in these subgroups (32.8% and 35.1%, respectively) still do not receive treatment.

Percent of advanced NSCLC pts, who are 80+ or PS2+, receiving 1L treatment, by category, each year 2015-2020.

Pt group
Treatment Category
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
80+
Anti-PD-1 single agent
4
11
23
22
21
21
Chemoimmunotherapy
0
0
5
12
19
19
No documented treatment
43
37
34
37
33
33
Plat-based doublet +/- VEGFi

or single agent chemotherapy
37
37
28
19
14
13
PS2+
Anti-PD-1 single agent
5
10
20
18
16
14
Chemoimmunotherapy
0
0
5
15
23
24
No documented treatment
35
34
37
36
36
35
Plat-based doublet +/- VEGFi

or single agent chemotherapy
51
45
30
22
15
15

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Real-World Data/Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr e18783)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18783

Abstract #

e18783

Abstract Disclosures