University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
Julie Vose , Jinghua He , Xiaoxiao Lu , Linda Wu , Tao Ran , Sumeet Panjabi
Background: Ibrutinib is an oral, once daily Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor and is a targeted treatment that has demonstrated progression-free survival and overall survival benefits in multiple phase 3 trials across age, fitness, and high-risk markers for CLL/SLL. Despite ibrutinib established as a preferred first-line (1L) treatment option, anti-CD20 monotherapy (rituximab or obinutuzumab) has been prescribed as symptomatic or palliative therapy. This retrospective study compared outcomes between ibrutinib and anti-CD20 monotherapy for CLL/SLL patients who initiated a 1L of therapy in community oncology practice. Methods: The nationwide Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record-derived de-identified database (03/04/2016-08/31/2021) was used to select patients with CLL/SLL who had ≥2 clinic visits and started 1L therapy with ibrutinib or anti-CD20 monotherapy. Patient baseline characteristics prior to 1L initiation were compared between the two treatment groups. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline differences between treatment groups. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis was used to evaluate time to next treatment (TTNT) from 1L initiation. Two subgroup analyses were performed among patients with high-risk cytogenetic markers (deletion 17p or 11q, or unmutated IGHV) and those without IGHV testing. Results: Overall, 3,226 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 2,188 (67.8%) received ibrutinib and 1,038 (32.2%) received an anti-CD20 antibody. The average age was 71.4 years for ibrutinib patients and 72.9 years among anti-CD20 users. Patients treated with ibrutinib were more likely to have high-risk cytogenetic markers (42.6% vs 27.9%). Ibrutinib-treated patients overall had a significant 70% risk reduction of initiating a subsequent treatment compared with anti-CD20 group (Table). Similar results were also found in subgroups of patients with high-risk and those without IGHV testing. Conclusions: IPTW-adjusted analysis showed that in the real-world community practice setting, treatment with ibrutinib resulted in a statistically significantly lower risk of initiating subsequent treatment than the anti-CD20 group including patients with high cytogenetic risk features and without IGHV testing.
TTNT Overall | High risk subgroup | IGHV untested subgroup | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ibrutinib | Anti-CD20 | Ibrutinib | Anti-CD20 | Ibrutinib | Anti-CD20 | |
Median TTNT (95% CI) | NR | 18.3 (14.9-20.9) | NR | 14.5 (10.9-20.2) | NR | 19.3 (14.9-24.0) |
Hazard ratio (95% CI) | 0.30 (0.27-0.34, p < 0.001) | 0.26 (0.21-0.33, p < 0.001) | 0.30 (0.26-0.36, p < 0.001) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Paul M. Barr
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Linda Wu
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jacqueline Claudia Barrientos
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Lori A. Leslie