Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Arun Azad , Taro Iguchi , Boris Alekseev , Neal D. Shore , Jennifer Sugg , Gabriel P. Haas , Michele Wozniak , Thomas O'Brien , Douglas Laird , Arnulf Stenzl , Andrew J. Armstrong
Background: DDR alterations are associated with poorer prognosis, including shorter overall survival (OS), in patients with mHSPC. In ARCHES (NCT02677896), patients with mHSPC treated with ENZA + ADT had a reduced risk of radiographic progression or death and improved OS versus PBO + ADT. This post hoc analysis assessed the prevalence of DDR alterations and associated baseline characteristics in patients with mHSPC in ARCHES. Methods: Patients with mHSPC (n=1150) were randomized 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT. Germline DDR alteration testing was performed in blood using Ambry Genetics CustomNext-Cancer panel; 16 DDR-related genes were reported in the subset of patients who consented to participate in a pharmacogenomic study (n=664; Table). Descriptive analyses of baseline demographics and disease characteristics by DDR status were performed. Results: Of 664 patient samples tested, 652 were evaluable for analysis (ENZA + ADT, n=326; PBO + ADT, n=326). Baseline characteristics of these patients were similar to the ARCHES intent-to-treat population. The prevalence of DDR+ patients was lower than expected (n=34/652, 5.2%; Table). Of DDR+ patients, 13 (38.2%) had low-volume disease, compared with 228 (36.9%) of DDR− patients. High-volume disease was present in 21 (61.8%) DDR+ and 390 (63.1%) DDR− patients. Of DDR+ patients, 6 (17.6%) had localized disease at initial diagnosis (M0), compared with 145 (23.5%) DDR− patients. De novo metastatic disease at initial diagnosis (M1) was present in 28 (82.4%) DDR+ patients and 465 (75.2%) DDR− patients. Of DDR+ patients, 29 (85.3%) were from Europe, four (11.8%) were from North America, and one (2.9%) was from the Asia-Pacific region. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis found a lower prevalence of DDR alterations in patients with mHSPC in ARCHES, compared with the 7–12% previously reported in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Lozano et al. Br J Cancer 2021; Pritchard et al. N Engl J Med 2016). We did not identify differences in baseline disease characteristics based on DDR status. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896.
n (%) | ENZA+ ADT (n=326) | PBO + ADT (n=326) | Total(N=652) |
---|---|---|---|
Negative for all DDR alterations | 308 (94.5) | 310 (95.1) | 618 (94.8) |
Positive for ≥1 of the following alterations: | |||
DDRa | 18 (5.5) | 16 (4.9) | 34 (5.2) |
CHEK2 | 8 (2.5) | 8 (2.5) | 16 (2.5) |
BRCA1/BRCA2/PALB2 | 5 (1.5) | 6 (1.8) | 11 (1.7) |
BRCA2 | 4 (1.2) | 5 (1.5) | 9 (1.4) |
ATM | 4 (1.2) | 1 (0.3) | 5 (0.8) |
NBN | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) |
PALB2 | 1 (0.3) | 1 (0.3) | 2 (0.3) |
BRCA1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
aDDR: ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, MLH1, MRE11A, NBN, PALB2, RAD50, RAD51C, FANCC, MSH2, MSH3, MSH6, POLD1, POLE. No patient had >1 alteration.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Andrew J. Armstrong
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nima Sharifi
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Arun Azad
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Andrew J. Armstrong