Neratinib plus fulvestrant plus trastzuzumab (N+F+T) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative, HER2-mutant metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Outcomes and biomarker analysis from the SUMMIT trial.

Authors

Komal Jhaveri

Komal L. Jhaveri

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Komal L. Jhaveri , Jonathan W. Goldman , Sara A. Hurvitz , Angel Guerrero-Zotano , Nisha Unni , Adam Brufsky , Haeseong Park , James Ross Waisman , Eddy Shih-Hsin Yang , Iben Spanggaard , Sonya A. Reid , Mark E. Burkard , Aleix Prat , Sherene Loi , John Crown , Ariella Hanker , Cynthia X. Ma , Ron Bose , Lisa DeFazio Eli , Hans Wildiers

Organizations

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, University of California-Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA, David Geffen School of Medicine; University of California, Los Angeles; Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Santa Monica, CA, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, Rigshospitalet – Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, The Vanderbilt Breast Center, Nashville, TN, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia, St. Vincent's Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, Puma Biotechnology, Inc., San Francisco, CA, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: N is an oral, irreversible pan-HER TKI with activity against HER2 mutations. Genomic analyses from the SUMMIT MBC cohort following N±F suggest that resistance to N may occur via mutant allele amplification or secondary HER2 mutations. Adding T to N+F in SUMMIT showed encouraging durable responses in patients (pts) with HR+, HER2-mutant MBC and prior CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Methods: SUMMIT (NCT01953926) enrolled pts with HR+, HER2-negative MBC with activating HER2 mutation(s) and prior CDK4/6i. Pts received N+F+T (oral N 240 mg/d with loperamide prophylaxis, im F 500 mg d1&15 of cycle 1 then q4w, iv T 8 mg/kg initially then 6 mg/kg q3w). During the small, randomized portion of the trial, pts received N+F+T, F+T or F (1:1:1 ratio). Pts randomized to F+T or F could crossover to N+F+T at progression. Efficacy endpoints: investigator-assessed ORR and CBR (RECIST v1.1); DOR; best overall response. Pre-treatment tumor tissue was centrally assessed retrospectively by next-generation sequencing. ctDNA from patient samples was assessed by NGS. Results: SUMMIT has completed enrolment; we report efficacy from 45 pts in the N+F+T cohort, plus 10 pts who progressed on F (n=6) or F+T (n=4) and crossed over to N+F+T (Table). HER2 allelic variants in the 45 N+F+T pts and ORR (%) (pts may have >1 mutation) were: V777L (n=6, 50%), L755S/P (n=15, 40%), S310F (n=4, 50%), exon 20 insertion (n=11, 36%), other KD missense (n=6, 33%), TMD missense (n=2, 0%), exon 19 deletion (n=1, 0%). Conclusions: N+F+T is a promising combination for HR+, HER2-mutated MBC with prior exposure to CDK4/6i, across a range of activating HER2 mutations. Results from the upcoming Apr 2022 data cut, including biomarkers, safety, mechanisms of acquired resistance, and preclinical mechanism of N+T, will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01953926.

Efficacy findings: HR+, HER2-mutant MBC with prior CDK4/6i.

All HR+
prior CDK4/6i
(N+F+T)
(n=45)
Randomized
HR+
(F+T)
(n=7)
F+T
crossover to N+F+T
(n=4)
Randomized
HR+
(F)
(n=7)
F
crossover to N+F+T
(n=6)
Objective response,a n (%)
(95% CI)
17 (38) (24–54)0 (0–41)1 (25) (0.6–81)0 (0–41)2 (33) (4–78)
CR
PR
1 (2)16 (36)0001 (25)0002 (33)
Medianb DOR, months (95% CI)14.4 (6.4–NE)NE
NE
NE
6.3 (6.2–6.4)
Clinical benefit,c n (%) (95% CI)21 (47) (32–62)0 (0–41)1 (25) (0.6–81)0 (0–41)5 (83) (36–100)
CR PR
SD ≥ 24 weeks
1 (2)16 (36)
4 (9)
00
0
01 (25)
0
00
0
02 (33)
3 (50)
Median PFS, months (95% CI)8.2 (4.2–15.1)3.9 (1.9–4.1)NE
4.1 (1.6–4.1)8.3 (3.9–10.3)

aCR or PR confirmed ≥ 4 weeks after response criteria met.bKaplan-Meier analysis.cConfirmed CR or PR or SD for ≥ 24 weeks. Tumor response based on investigator assessment (RECIST v1.1).CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; DOR, duration of response; F, fulvestrant; HR+, hormone receptor-positive; N, neratinib; NE, not evaluable; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; T, trastuzumab.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Biologic Correlates

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01953926

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1028)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1028

Abstract #

1028

Poster Bd #

406

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts