Eribulin mesylate versus eribulin plus anlotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer: Results of a phase II study.

Authors

null

Liping Liu

Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital / The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China

Liping Liu , Zhe-Yu Hu , Ning Xie , Xiaohong Yang , Huawu Xiao , Jing Li , Can Tian , Hui Wu , Jun Lu , Jianxiang Gao , Xuming Hu , Min Cao , Zhengrong Shui , Bingliang Liu , Quchang Ouyang

Organizations

Department of Breast Cancer Medical Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital / The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, China

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Eribulin mesylate is a structurally simplified, synthetic, macrocyclic ketone analogue of Halichondrin B. We investigated the efficacy and safety of eribulin monotherapy versus eribulin plus the oral anti-angiogenesis inhibitor anlotinib in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Methods: This Phase II study included adult Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with at least two chemotherapy regimens, including both anthracycline- and taxane-based therapy (NCT05206656). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive eribulin (1.4 mg/m2, intravenously, on days 1−8), alone or in combination with anlotinib (12 mg orally once daily), in 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR), per RECIST version 1.1. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: Between February 12, 2020, and July 22, 2021, 56 patients were randomized to eribulin (n=32) or eribulin plus anlotinib (n=24) (Table). Sites of metastasis were: bone (60.7%), lung (52.7%), liver (53.6%), lymph nodes (73.2%) and soft tissue (7.1%). Among all patients, the DCR was 66.7% versus 100% (treatment difference, 33.3%; P=0.007), the ORR was 37.0% versus 38.9%, and the median PFS was 3.7 months versus 9.7 months (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.91; P=0.04) for patients receiving eribulin versus eribulin plus anlotinib, respectively. Among 36 (64.3%) patients with triple-negative breast cancer, the DCR was 55.6% versus 72.2% (treatment difference, 16.7%; P=0.300) and the median PFS was 3.6 months versus 9.7 months (log rank P=0.030) with eribulin alone versus eribulin plus anlotinib, respectively. The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events in the eribulin and eribulin plus anlotinib groups were decreased neutrophil count (25.0% [n=8] vs. 29.2% [n=7]) elevated transaminase (6.3% [n=2] vs. 0.0%) and decreased thrombocyte count (3.1% [n=1] vs. 0.0%), respectively. Conclusions: Eribulin plus anlotinib was associated with a significantly better DCR, ORR and PFS than eribulin monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes. Clinical trial information: NCT05206656.

Patient clinical characteristics.

Variable
All patients (N=56)
Eribulin (n=32)
Eribulin plus anlotinib (n=24)
Mean age at eribulin usage ± SD (years)
48.9 ± 8.1
49.0 ± 8.2
48.8 ± 8.0
Time from diagnosis to relapse or metastasis ± SD (months)
28.2 ± 35.3
31.8 ± 40.3
23.5 ± 27.3
Surgery, n (%)
49 (87.5)
29 (90.6)
20 (83.3)
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)
12 (21.4)
6 (18.7)
6 (25.0)
Adjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)
47 (83.9)
28 (87.5)
19 (79.2)
ER positive, n (%)
18 (32.1)
13 (40.6)
5 (20.8)
PR positive, n (%)
10 (17.9)
7 (21.9)
3 (12.5)
HER2 positive, n (%)
2 (3.6)
2 (6.2)
0 (0.0)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Other Breast Cancer Subtypes

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT05206656

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1094)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1094

Abstract #

1094

Poster Bd #

471

Abstract Disclosures