Dynamic monitoring of cerebrospinal fluid circulating tumor DNA to identify unique genetic profiles of brain metastatic tumors and to better predict intracranial tumor response in patients with non–small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: A prospective cohort study.

Authors

null

Meichen Li

Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China

Meichen Li , Xue Hou , Jing Chen , Baishen Zhang , Juan Yu , Na Wang , Delan Li , Yang Shao , Dongqin Zhu , Chuqiao Liang , Qiuxiang Ou , Yutong Ma , Likun Chen

Organizations

Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China, Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China, Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China, Chemotherapy Department 2, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China, Geneseeq Research Institute, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Nanjing, China, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) can be used as a type of liquid biopsy to detect brain tumors. We aimed to explore the genetic profiles of CSF-derived circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict intracranial tumor response and monitor mutational evolution during systemic treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastases. Methods: We conducted aprospective study of 92 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients with brain metastases. Paired CSF and plasma samples were collected at baseline, 8 weeks after treatment initiation, and at disease progression. Primary extracranial tumor samples were available for 58 patients and all samples underwent targeted next generation sequencing of 425 cancer-related genes. Results: At baseline, the positive detection rates of ctDNA in CSF, plasma, and extracranial tumors were 63.7% (58/91), 91.1% (82/90), and 100% (58/58), respectively. A high level of heterogeneity was observed between paired CSF and plasma samples, while concordance in driver mutations was also observed. A higher number of unique copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in CSF ctDNA than in plasma. CtDNA-positivity in baseline CSF samples was associated with poor outcomes (HR = 2.565, P = 0.003). Moreover, patients with increased concentrations of ctDNA in CSF after 8 weeks of treatment had significantly shorter intracranial progression-free survivals (PFS) than patients with decreased concentrations of CSF ctDNA (6.13 months vs 13.27 months, HR = 3.92, P = 0.007). Increased concentrations of plasma ctDNA were associated with shorter extracranial PFS (6.13 months vs 11.57 months, HR = 2.626, P = 0.032). From clonal evolution analyses, the accumulation of subclonal mutations in CSF ctDNA was observed after 8 weeks of systemic treatment. The clonal mutations remained more than 80% in CSF after 8-weeks of treatment also predicted a shorter intracranial PFS (HR = 3.785, P = 0.039). Conclusions: CSF ctDNA revealed unique genetic profiles of brain metastases, and dynamic changes in CSF ctDNA could better predict intracranial tumor response and track clonal evolution during treatment in NSCLC patients with brain metastases.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Brain Metastases

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 2023)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.2023

Abstract #

2023

Poster Bd #

361

Abstract Disclosures