University Medical Center Utrecht, Leiden, Netherlands
Olivier Jules van Not , Rik Jasper Verheijden , Alfonsus Johannes Maria van den Eertwegh , John B. A. G. Haanen , Christian U. Blank , Maureen J.B. Aarts , Franchette Van Den Berkmortel , Jan Willem de Groot , Geke Hospers , Ellen Kapiteijn , Melissa Melanie de Meza , Djura Piersma , Rozemarijn Van Rijn , Marion Stevense - den Boer , Astrid Aplonia Maria Van Der Veldt , Gerard Vreugdenhil , Marye J. Boers-Sonderen , Willeke Blokx , Michel W.J.M. Wouters , Karijn Suijkerbuijk
Background: Management of checkpoint-inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is primarily based on expert opinion. Recent studies have suggested detrimental effects of immunosuppressive treatment with anti-TNF on checkpoint-inhibitor efficacy. Methods: Advanced melanoma patients experiencing grade ≥3 irAEs after treatment with first-line ipilimumab-nivolumab between 2015 and 2021 were included from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were analyzed according to toxicity management regimen. A cox proportional hazards model was used to account for the confounders age, sex, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, site of metastases and type of irAE. Results: Out of 771 ipilimumab-nivolumab treated patients, 350 were treated with immunosuppression for severe irAEs. Of these patients, 235 received steroids only and 115 received steroids with second-line immunosuppressants consisting of anti-TNF, mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus and other immunosuppressants. Median PFS was significantly longer for patients treated with steroids (11.3 months) than for patients treated with steroids and second-line immunosuppressants (5.4 months; HR 1.43; 95%CI 1.07-1.90; p = 0.01). Median OS was also significantly longer for the steroids group (46.1 months) than for the steroids and second-line immunosuppressants group (22.5 months; HR 1.64; 95%CI 1.16-2.32; p = 0.005). Results for MSS were similar (not reached versus 28.8 months; HR 1.70; 95%CI 1.16-2.49; p = 0.006). Median PFS, OS and MSS are shown in Table 1. After adjustment for potential confounders, patients treated with steroids + second-line immunosuppressants showed a non-significant trend towards a higher risk of progression (HRadj 1.40; 95%CI 1.00-1.97; p = 0.05), a higher risk of death (HRadj 1.54; 95%CI 1.03-2.30; p = 0.04) and of melanoma-specific death (HRadj 1.62; 95%CI 1.04-2.51; p = 0.032) compared to the steroids group. Conclusions: Second-line immunosuppression for irAEs is associated with impaired PFS, OS, and MSS in advanced melanoma patients treated with first-line ipilimumab-nivolumab, irrespective of being anti-TNF or other second-line immunosuppressants. These findings stress the importance of assessing the effects of differential irAE management strategies, not only in melanoma but also in other tumor types.
Median PFS mo (95% CI) | P-value* | Median OS mo (95% CI) | P-value* | Median MSS mo (95% CI) | P-value* | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Steroids (n = 235) | 11.3 (9.6 – 19.5) | 46.1 (39.0 – NR) | NR (46.1 – NR) | |||
Steroids + all second-line immunosuppressants (n = 115) | 5.4 (4.5 – 12.4) | 0.014 | 22.5 (36.5 – NR) | 0.005 | 28.8 (20.5 – NR) 0.0 | 0.006 |
Steroids + anti-TNF (n = 67) | 5.4 (4.7 – 13.1) | 0.034 | 28.7 (12.2 – NR) | 0.019 | 31.7 (15.7 – NR) | 0.033 |
Steroids + other second-line immunosuppressants (n = 35) | 4.3 (2.5 – 13.2) | 0.025 | 22.4 (13.2 – NR) | 0.084 | 22.4 (13.2 – NR) | 0.024 |
*Compared to steroids group.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium
First Author: Ayo Samuel Falade
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Samuel Cass
2019 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Charlene Mantia
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Meredith M. Regan