Management of checkpoint inhibitor toxicity and survival in patients with advanced melanoma.

Authors

null

Olivier Jules van Not

University Medical Center Utrecht, Leiden, Netherlands

Olivier Jules van Not , Rik Jasper Verheijden , Alfonsus Johannes Maria van den Eertwegh , John B. A. G. Haanen , Christian U. Blank , Maureen J.B. Aarts , Franchette Van Den Berkmortel , Jan Willem de Groot , Geke Hospers , Ellen Kapiteijn , Melissa Melanie de Meza , Djura Piersma , Rozemarijn Van Rijn , Marion Stevense - den Boer , Astrid Aplonia Maria Van Der Veldt , Gerard Vreugdenhil , Marye J. Boers-Sonderen , Willeke Blokx , Michel W.J.M. Wouters , Karijn Suijkerbuijk

Organizations

University Medical Center Utrecht, Leiden, Netherlands, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands, Department of Medical Oncology, Zuyderland Medical Centre Sittard, Sittard, Netherlands, Department of Medical Oncology, Isala Oncology Center, Zwolle, Netherlands, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, Leiden University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden, Netherlands, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, MST, Enschede, Netherlands, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Netherlands, Amphia Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Breda, Netherlands, Departments of Medical Oncology and Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, Maxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, Netherlands, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands, UMCU, Utrecht, Netherlands

Research Funding

Other

Background: Management of checkpoint-inhibitor-induced immune-related adverse events (irAEs) is primarily based on expert opinion. Recent studies have suggested detrimental effects of immunosuppressive treatment with anti-TNF on checkpoint-inhibitor efficacy. Methods: Advanced melanoma patients experiencing grade ≥3 irAEs after treatment with first-line ipilimumab-nivolumab between 2015 and 2021 were included from the Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were analyzed according to toxicity management regimen. A cox proportional hazards model was used to account for the confounders age, sex, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase, site of metastases and type of irAE. Results: Out of 771 ipilimumab-nivolumab treated patients, 350 were treated with immunosuppression for severe irAEs. Of these patients, 235 received steroids only and 115 received steroids with second-line immunosuppressants consisting of anti-TNF, mycophenolic acid, tacrolimus and other immunosuppressants. Median PFS was significantly longer for patients treated with steroids (11.3 months) than for patients treated with steroids and second-line immunosuppressants (5.4 months; HR 1.43; 95%CI 1.07-1.90; p = 0.01). Median OS was also significantly longer for the steroids group (46.1 months) than for the steroids and second-line immunosuppressants group (22.5 months; HR 1.64; 95%CI 1.16-2.32; p = 0.005). Results for MSS were similar (not reached versus 28.8 months; HR 1.70; 95%CI 1.16-2.49; p = 0.006). Median PFS, OS and MSS are shown in Table 1. After adjustment for potential confounders, patients treated with steroids + second-line immunosuppressants showed a non-significant trend towards a higher risk of progression (HRadj 1.40; 95%CI 1.00-1.97; p = 0.05), a higher risk of death (HRadj 1.54; 95%CI 1.03-2.30; p = 0.04) and of melanoma-specific death (HRadj 1.62; 95%CI 1.04-2.51; p = 0.032) compared to the steroids group. Conclusions: Second-line immunosuppression for irAEs is associated with impaired PFS, OS, and MSS in advanced melanoma patients treated with first-line ipilimumab-nivolumab, irrespective of being anti-TNF or other second-line immunosuppressants. These findings stress the importance of assessing the effects of differential irAE management strategies, not only in melanoma but also in other tumor types.


Median PFS mo (95% CI)
P-value*
Median OS mo (95% CI)
P-value*
Median MSS mo (95% CI)
P-value*
Steroids
(n = 235)
11.3
(9.6 – 19.5)

46.1
(39.0 – NR)

NR
(46.1 – NR)

Steroids +
all second-line immunosuppressants (n = 115)
5.4
(4.5 – 12.4)
0.014
22.5
(36.5 – NR)
0.005
28.8
(20.5 – NR) 0.0
0.006
Steroids + anti-TNF
(n = 67)
5.4
(4.7 – 13.1)
0.034
28.7
(12.2 – NR)
0.019
31.7
(15.7 – NR)
0.033
Steroids +
other second-line immunosuppressants (n = 35)
4.3
(2.5 – 13.2)
0.025
22.4
(13.2 – NR)
0.084
22.4
(13.2 – NR)
0.024

*Compared to steroids group.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Advanced/Metastatic Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 9546)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.9546

Abstract #

9546

Poster Bd #

139

Abstract Disclosures