EO2401, a novel microbiome-derived therapeutic vaccine for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC): Preliminary results of the SPENCER study.

Authors

null

Eric Baudin

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Eric Baudin , Camilo Jimenez , Martin Fassnacht , Salvatore Grisanti , Catharina Wilhelmina Menke , Harm Haak , Vivek Subbiah , Jaume Capdevila , Christelle De La Fouchardiere , Dan Granberg , Gedske Daugaard , Otilia Kimpel , Matthias Kroiss , Livia Lamartina , Laurent Chêne , Jean-Michel Paillarse , Alfredo Berruti

Organizations

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University Hospital, Würzburg, Germany, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Máxima Medisch Centrum, Eindhoven, Netherlands, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, TX, Medical Oncology Department. Vall Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark, LMU University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany, Enterome, Paris, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: In advanced ACC, no significant progress has been made since introduction of mitotane and cisplatin-based therapy. EO2401 (EO) was designed to activate existing commensal memory T cells cross-reacting with tumor associated antigens (TAAs). EO includes microbial-derived, synthetically produced peptides corresponding to HLA-A2 restricted epitopes with molecular mimicry to three TAAs upregulated in ACC, IL13Rα2, BIRC5 and FOXM1, with the CD4 helper peptide UCP2 and the adjuvant Montanide. Pre-clinically EO generates strong immune responses and cross-reactive CD8 cells recognizing the TAAs. Methods: This Phase 1/2 trial (NCT04187404) investigated EO + nivolumab (N) (EO + N = EN) in pts with ACC. Cohort 1 lead-in established safety of EN. Cohort 2 includes pts with metastatic ACC, with (C2a), or without (C2b) prior systemic therapy. EN was given 4 times q2 w, followed by boosters q4 w until PD (iRECIST). Results: 33 pts with ACC started study treatment: C2a 26 pts (58% 1; 42% 2 prior lines), C2b 7 pts. Median age 47; 24% men; ECOG 0/52%, 1/42%, 2/6%; 61% ≥2 organs involved by metastases (61% liver, 76% lung). EN was well tolerated. The combination safety profile was consistent with the profile of N monotherapy except for higher local administration site reactions (any erythema/pain/induration in 35% of pts). Overall (n = 33), best RECIST response was PR 12%, SD 24%, PD 45%, NE 18%; median PFS was 1.9 mo (range 0.4-7.6+); median survival not reached, and survival rate at 6-mo 63% (median FU 4.9 mo, range 0.9-12.0). Strong CD8 T cell ELISPOT responses against the vaccine peptides (9/9 pts) and cross-reactivity against targeted TAAs (8/8 evaluable pts) was observed. Tetramer staining of specific CD8 cells for all 3 peptides was detected in 7/8 tested. When investigated, positive staining against BIRC5 was detected as early as 4 w after the first vaccination. In C2a, a group of pts (n = 10) with SD at the first CT (incl. 4 pts with PR) seemed to fare well; all investigated tumor samples in this group showed a low level of TMB, low MSI, and low PDL1 expression. In contrast, 10 pts had PD < 2mo and died < 6mo. There was no correlation between clinical benefit and a large panel of cytokines/chemokines. However, post-hoc analysis identified several clinical factors (prior mitotane, ECOG ≤ 1, ACC 1st diagnosis > 9 mo, max lesion ≤125 mm, ≤3 organs involved, lymphocytes ≤ grade 1) that excluded 90% of pts without benefit to EN. In the post-hoc selected group (n = 14) with median FU 6.9 mo (12 pts censored) the DCR was 64% (4 PR, 5 SD), 6-mo PFS was 42% and 6-mo survival rate 93%. Conclusions: EO2401 in combination with nivolumab was well tolerated and induced a specific immune response in all tested pts. In addition, efficacy was seen in a subpopulation of pts with ACC defined by clinical parameters in a post-hoc analysis. A randomized phase 2 study based on the findings of Cohort 2a is being planned. Clinical trial information: NCT04187404.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Other GU Kidney and Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04187404

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 4596)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.4596

Abstract #

4596

Poster Bd #

87

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts