BMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Mehdi Hamadani , Christopher N. Graham , Laura Liao , Katherine H Zhang , Hannah Strat , David Ungar , Weiyun Z. Ai , Lei Chen , Carmelo Carlo-Stella
Background: Loncastuximab tesirine (loncastuximab tesirine-lpyl; Lonca) is an FDA approved CD19-directed antibody-drug conjugate for R/R DLBCL. From the LOTIS-2 trial primary data cut (April 6, 2020), overall response rate was 48.3% and median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months. The OS Kaplan-Meier (KM) plot displayed a survival plateau suggesting the presence of long-term survivors (LTS). Survival analyses were conducted on a more mature data cut (March 1, 2021; median follow-up = 1.7 years, follow-up completeness at median = 81%) to estimate the percentage of LTS and expected lifetime survival (mean OS) for lonca-treated patients. Methods: Consistent with studies of other R/R DLBCL treatments, identified through a literature review, parametric and mixture cure models were fit utilizing multiple distributions. Flexible cubic spline (hazard scale 1-3 knots) and non-mixture cure analyses were also conducted. Age- and gender-matched United States life table hazards were used in projections for LTS and to ensure modeled hazards were not less than the general population. Best-fit models were determined through fit statistics, KM and fitted curve overlays, and clinical plausibility. The best-fit model from each method was a candidate for overall best fit. A hybrid model following the best-fit parametric/spline model to a defined time point and switching to general population mortality was also constructed. Results: Mixture and non-mixture cure models fit best (individual best fits gamma and Weibull, respectively). Parametric and spline models (individual best fits log-normal and 2 knot models, respectively) did not fit the observed data well nor fit the clinical expectation of long-term survival. Due to better fit, spline models were used in the hybrid model. LTS from the mixture cure and non-mixture cure models were 24-26%. Mixture cure, non-mixture cure, and hybrid model with a 2-year switch point were consistent in survival predictions (6.11-6.23 years). In a sensitivity analysis with 3-year switch point in the hybrid model, the estimated survival was shorter due to the switch point being below the observed survival plateau. Table presents full survival results and fit statistics. Conclusions: The observed survival plateau suggests lonca-treated patients may include LTS. Mixture cure, non-mixture cure, and hybrid models fit the trial data well and align on survival projections (6.11-6.23 years). Additional follow-up may help refine the switch point of the hybrid model and confirm presence of LTS.
Method | Distribution | Mean Survival, years | AIC |
---|---|---|---|
Parametric | Log-normal | 1.97 | 238.7 |
Flexible cubic spline | Hazard, 2 knots | 2.39 | 240.2 |
Mixture cure | Gamma | 6.13 | 236.7 |
Non-mixture cure | Weibull | 6.11 | 236.8 |
Hybrid flexible cubic spline | Hazard, 2 knots,2-year switch point | 6.23 | -- |
Hybrid flexible cubic spline | Hazard, 2 knots,3-year switch point | 4.96 | -- |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Aung M. Tun
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Johannes Duell
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Radhika Takiar
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Jhanelle Elaine Gray