OReO/ENGOT Ov-38 trial: Impact of maintenance olaparib rechallenge according to ovarian cancer patient prognosis—An exploratory joint analysis of the BRCA and non-BRCA cohorts.

Authors

null

Frederic Selle

GINECO & Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France

Frederic Selle , Bernard Asselain , François Montestruc , Fernando Bazan , Beatriz Pardo , Vanda Salutari , Frederik Marmé , Anja Ør Knudsen , Alessandra Bologna , Radoslaw Madry , Rosalind Glasspool , Stéphanie Henry , Jacob Korach , Stephanie Lheureux , Bob Shaw , Ana Santaballa , Raffaella Cioffi , Ulrich Canzler , Alain Lortholary , Eric Pujade-Lauraine

Organizations

GINECO & Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon, Paris, France, Biostatistics, ARCAGY-GINECO, Paris, France, eXYSTAT, Malakoff, France, CHRU de Besançon, institut régional fédératif du cancer de Franche Comté, Besançon, France, Institut Català d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran i Reynals and GEICO, Barcelona, Spain, Gynecology Oncology Unit Fondazione Policlinico gemelli, Roma, Italy, University Hospital Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, NSGO-CTU, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale di Reggio Emilia IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy, Klinika Ginekologii Onkologicznej, Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, PGOG, Poznań, Poland, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow and SGCTG/NCRI, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UCL Namur Site Ste Elisabeth, Service d’onco-hématologie (SORMN), Namur, Belgium, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Ramat Gan and Israeli Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ISGO), Tel Hashomer, Israel, Princess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology, and Princess Margaret Consortium, Toronto, ON, Canada, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Hospital Universitario y Politecnico La Fe and GEICO, Valencia, Spain, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Hôpital Privé du Confluent, and GINECO, Nantes, France, ARCAGY-GINECO, and GINECO, Paris, France

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: In the Phase IIIb OReO/ENGOT Ov-38 trial (NCT03106987), maintenance olaparib (O) rechallenge significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo in patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) regardless of their BRCA status (Pujade-Lauraine, ESMO 2021). The impact of prognostic factors on this PFS benefit were unknown. Methods: Pts had PSROC, one prior line of PARP inhibitor (PARPi) maintenance and were in response to platinum-based chemotherapy (Cx). Pts were enrolled into two cohorts – BRCA mutated (BRCAm) and non-BRCAm – and randomized to receive maintenance O (300 mg bid) or placebo. Primary endpoint was PFS. Post-hoc individual patient data meta-analysis was used to combine both cohorts using fixed and random effect models, interaction, and stratified tests in the Cox model. Stepwise Cox multivariate model for PFS and logistic regression models were used for late relapse, defined as disease progression occurring >24 weeks after randomization. Randomization stratification criteria and cohort effect were included in all models. Results: This study included 220 pts from the BRCAm (n=112) and non-BRCAm (n=108) cohorts recruited between October 3, 2017 and February 10, 2021. No heterogeneity was detected between cohorts: Cochran’s Q test P=0.53 (fixed and random); interaction test P=0.63. The O effect was consistent, and no significant interactions were observed between subgroups. In the multivariate PFS analyses, the main independent factors for prognosis were CA-125 level, visceral disease (liver, lung, pleura, brain), and treatment arm. These factors were independent predictive factors for late relapse among the 181 evaluable pts with the opportunity of at least 6 months of follow-up (Table). Conclusions: In the OReO/ENGOT Ov-38 trial, CA-125 level and presence of visceral disease at baseline were the best predictors of patient outcome. Maintenance olaparib rechallenge was effective overall regardless of prognostic subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT03106987.


No

patients
PFS univariate

HR (95% CI)*
P
PFS multivariate

HR (95% CI)*
P
Treatment (olaparib/placebo)

CA-125 (>35/<35 U/mL)

Visceral disease (yes/no)

Prior bevacizumab (yes/no)

BRCA status (negative/positive)
146/74

64/152

61/159

117/103

108/112
0.54 (0.39-0.73)

1.75 (1.27-2.41)

1.82 (1.32-2.52)

1.35 (1.01-1.82)

0.99 (0.74-1.33)
<.01

<.01

<.01

.04

.95
0.53 (0.38-0.73)

1.50 (1.08-2.07)

2.04 (1.46-2.85)

1.35 (1.00-1.84)


<.0001

.015

<.0001

.052


Previous PARPi
- Exposure (≤18/>18 months)

- Type (olaparib/others)
102/80

126/94
0.77 (0.56-1.07)

0.96 (0.71-1.30)
.12

.81
No of prior lines of Cx (≤3/>3)
141/79
1.05 (0.78-1.42)
.75


PFS at Placebo24 weeks (%) Olaparib
Visceral disease (no)
- CA-125 <35

- CA-125 ≥35
96

34
28

15
53

36
Visceral disease (yes)

- CA-125 <35

- CA-125 ≥35
32

19
0

0
23

12

*Cox Proportional-Hazards Model.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03106987

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 5558)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5558

Abstract #

5558

Poster Bd #

437

Abstract Disclosures