Lille University Hospital Center, Lille Cedex, France
Franck Morschhauser , Yanwen Jiang , Fabrice Jardin , Alex Francisco Herrera , Laurie Helen Sehn , Charles Herbaux , Christopher Flowers , Tycel Jovelle Phillips , Armando López Guillermo , Catherine S. Magid Diefenbach , Gareth Gregory , Austin Injae Kim , Anna Maria Barbui , Sandhya Balasubramanian , Will Harris , Jamie Hirata , Joseph N. Paulson , Calvin Lee , Georg Lenz
Background: Overexpression of BCL2 and MYC, and translocation of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6, are associated with poorer outcomes in patients (pts) with DLBCL (Horn et al. Blood 2013). We previously reported progression-free survival (PFS) from POLARIX in subgroups of pts with DLBCL receiving Pola-R-CHP or R-CHOP, including pts with double expressor lymphoma (DEL; favoring Pola-R-CHP: hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–0.97), and double- or triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/THL; favoring R-CHOP: HR 3.81, 95% CI 0.82–17.64) (Tilly et al. NEJM 2022). In this prespecified exploratory analysis, we further analyzed immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression status of BCL2, MYC, and rearrangements (R) of BCL2, BCL6 and MYC as independent prognostic markers. We also explored the prognostic impact of DEL within treatment arms. Methods: BCL2 and MYC protein expression were assessed by IHC and identified as IHC+ (≥50% [BCL2]/≥40% [MYC]) or IHC−; MYC-R, BCL2-R, and BCL6-R were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (Tilly et al. NEJM, 2022). Exploratory multivariate Cox regression models were adjusted for treatment, stratification factors (IPI, bulky disease, geographic region), age >60 years, cell of origin, and biomarker evaluated, as appropriate. Results: The prevalence, univariate HR, and 2-year (yr) PFS estimates of BCL2+/MYC+ and BCL2-R/MYC-R/BCL6-R subgroups are presented (Table) except for BCL6-R, because all 4 PFS events in this subgroup were with Pola-R-CHP. Multivariate analyses results for Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP in pts with BCL2+ (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43–0.86) and in pts with MYC+ (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.89) were similar to results of univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses of other subgroups were not performed due to the low pt number with BCL2-R/MYC-R/BCL6-R. While pts with DEL treated with Pola-R-CHP had improved PFS vs pts treated with R-CHOP (HR 0.64, 0.42–0.97), the prognostic impact of DEL vs non-DEL was more pronounced with R-CHOP (univariate HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06–2.21; multivariate HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.88–1.91) vs Pola-R-CHP (univariate HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.72–1.69; multivariate HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.89–2.28). Conclusions: Multivariate analyses support the benefit of Pola-R-CHP in pts with BCL2+ and MYC+ DLBCL. The poor prognostic impact associated with DEL appears reduced in Pola-R-CHP- vs R-CHOP-treated pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03274492.
Pola-R-CHP | R-CHOP | Univariate PFS HR (95% CI) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N, prevalence (%) | 2-yr PFS (%) | N, prevalence (%) | 2-yr PFS (%) | ||
BCL2 IHC BCL2+ BCL2– | 359 56 44 | 75 79 | 365 55 45 | 63 80 | 0.65 (0.46–0.92) 0.97 (0.60–1.56) |
MYC IHC MYC+ MYC– | 366 64 36 | 78 75 | 368 70 30 | 69 74 | 0.68 (0.48–0.96) 0.92 (0.57–1.51) |
BCL2-R Yes No | 332 28 72 | 77 76 | 334 23 77 | 76 70 | 0.90 (0.51–1.59) 0.78 (0.55–1.09) |
MYC-R Yes No | 331 12 88 | 77 76 | 336 10 90 | 71 71 | 0.86 (0.36–2.08) 0.78 (0.57–1.06) |
BCL6-R* Yes No | 38 26 74 | 70 79 | 34 29 71 | 100 58 | Not evaluable 0.46 (0.17–1.26) |
*BCL6-R only tested in pts with MYC-R; N=pts with central lab results.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Umberto Vitolo
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Yan Qin
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Odiljon Kobilov
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Bei Hu