Outcomes by BCL2 and MYC expression and rearrangements in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) from the POLARIX trial.

Authors

null

Franck Morschhauser

Lille University Hospital Center, Lille Cedex, France

Franck Morschhauser , Yanwen Jiang , Fabrice Jardin , Alex Francisco Herrera , Laurie Helen Sehn , Charles Herbaux , Christopher Flowers , Tycel Jovelle Phillips , Armando López Guillermo , Catherine S. Magid Diefenbach , Gareth Gregory , Austin Injae Kim , Anna Maria Barbui , Sandhya Balasubramanian , Will Harris , Jamie Hirata , Joseph N. Paulson , Calvin Lee , Georg Lenz

Organizations

Lille University Hospital Center, Lille Cedex, France, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, University of Rouen, Rouen, France, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, BC Cancer Centre for Lymphoid Cancer and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Atlanta, GA, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, Melbourne Haematology School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Overexpression of BCL2 and MYC, and translocation of MYC, BCL2, and BCL6, are associated with poorer outcomes in patients (pts) with DLBCL (Horn et al. Blood 2013). We previously reported progression-free survival (PFS) from POLARIX in subgroups of pts with DLBCL receiving Pola-R-CHP or R-CHOP, including pts with double expressor lymphoma (DEL; favoring Pola-R-CHP: hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42–0.97), and double- or triple-hit lymphoma (DHL/THL; favoring R-CHOP: HR 3.81, 95% CI 0.82–17.64) (Tilly et al. NEJM 2022). In this prespecified exploratory analysis, we further analyzed immunohistochemistry (IHC) expression status of BCL2, MYC, and rearrangements (R) of BCL2, BCL6 and MYC as independent prognostic markers. We also explored the prognostic impact of DEL within treatment arms. Methods: BCL2 and MYC protein expression were assessed by IHC and identified as IHC+ (≥50% [BCL2]/≥40% [MYC]) or IHC−; MYC-R, BCL2-R, and BCL6-R were detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (Tilly et al. NEJM, 2022). Exploratory multivariate Cox regression models were adjusted for treatment, stratification factors (IPI, bulky disease, geographic region), age >60 years, cell of origin, and biomarker evaluated, as appropriate. Results: The prevalence, univariate HR, and 2-year (yr) PFS estimates of BCL2+/MYC+ and BCL2-R/MYC-R/BCL6-R subgroups are presented (Table) except for BCL6-R, because all 4 PFS events in this subgroup were with Pola-R-CHP. Multivariate analyses results for Pola-R-CHP vs R-CHOP in pts with BCL2+ (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.43–0.86) and in pts with MYC+ (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45–0.89) were similar to results of univariate analyses. Multivariate analyses of other subgroups were not performed due to the low pt number with BCL2-R/MYC-R/BCL6-R. While pts with DEL treated with Pola-R-CHP had improved PFS vs pts treated with R-CHOP (HR 0.64, 0.42–0.97), the prognostic impact of DEL vs non-DEL was more pronounced with R-CHOP (univariate HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.06–2.21; multivariate HR 1.29, 95% CI 0.88–1.91) vs Pola-R-CHP (univariate HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.72–1.69; multivariate HR 1.42, 95% CI 0.89–2.28). Conclusions: Multivariate analyses support the benefit of Pola-R-CHP in pts with BCL2+ and MYC+ DLBCL. The poor prognostic impact associated with DEL appears reduced in Pola-R-CHP- vs R-CHOP-treated pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03274492.

Pola-R-CHPR-CHOPUnivariate PFS HR (95% CI)
N, prevalence (%)2-yr PFS (%)N, prevalence (%)2-yr PFS (%)
BCL2 IHC

BCL2+

BCL2–
359

56

44


75

79
365

55

45


63

80


0.65 (0.46–0.92)

0.97 (0.60–1.56)
MYC IHC

MYC+

MYC–
366

64

36


78

75
368

70

30


69

74


0.68 (0.48–0.96)

0.92 (0.57–1.51)
BCL2-R

Yes

No
332

28

72


77

76
334

23

77


76

70


0.90 (0.51–1.59)

0.78 (0.55–1.09)
MYC-R

Yes

No
331

12

88


77

76
336

10

90


71

71


0.86 (0.36–2.08)

0.78 (0.57–1.06)
BCL6-R*

Yes

No
38

26

74


70

79
34

29

71


100

58


Not evaluable

0.46 (0.17–1.26)

*BCL6-R only tested in pts with MYC-R; N=pts with central lab results.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Lymphoma and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03274492

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 7517)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.7517

Abstract #

7517

Poster Bd #

171

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Yan Qin

First Author: Odiljon Kobilov

First Author: Bei Hu