Results from plasmaMATCH trial cohort E: A phase II trial of olaparib and ceralasertib in patients with triple-negative advanced breast cancer (CRUK/15/010).

Authors

null

Alistair E. Ring

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom

Alistair E. Ring , Laura Moretti , Angelica Afshari-Mehr , Andrew M. Wardley , Lucy Kilburn , Bora Gurel , Iain R. MacPherson , Richard D. Baird , Sue Martin , Alex Pearson , Rebecca Roylance , Matthew Winter , Kathryn Dunne , Ellen Copson , Tamas Hickish , Peter Stephens , Russell J. Burcombe , Katrina Randle , Judith Bliss , Nicholas C. Turner

Organizations

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom, Institute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), London, United Kingdom, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, Outreach Research & Innovation Group, Manchester, United Kingdom, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom, Cancer Research UK, Cambridge Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom, Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust & NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom, The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research and Ralph Lauren Centre for Breast Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, Royal Bournemouth Hospital and Poole General Hospital, Bournemouth, United Kingdom, Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter, United Kingdom, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Kent, United Kingdom, Independent Cancer Patients' Voice, London, United Kingdom, The Institute of Cancer Research, Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit, London, United Kingdom, Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom

Research Funding

Other
Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The plasmaMATCH trial was an open label platform trial, consisting of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing in ̃1000 patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) linked to parallel treatment cohorts with therapies matched to mutations identified in ctDNA. Cohorts A-D have already reported (Turner N et al, Lancet Oncol 2020). Cohort E recruited patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) without a targetable mutation identified at ctDNA screening, treating with olaparib (PARP inhibitor) plus ceralasertib (ATR inhibitor). Methods: Patients with TNBC who had received 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease or relapsed within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. Treatment was olaparib 300mg b.i.d continuously and ceralasertib 160mg qd on days 1–7 on a 28 day cycle, until disease progression. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Biomarker analysis included response according to BRCA and somatic DNA repair gene status and ATM loss. Using a two-stage design with a target response rate of 25%, unacceptable response rate of 10%, alpha=2% and power=90%, ≥13 responses out of 69 evaluable stage 2 patients were required to infer efficacy (5/37 stage 1). Results: Between 17/09/18 and 5/10/20 75 patients enrolled in Cohort E of whom 70 were evaluable for response. The median age was 55.6 years. 42 (56%) patients had 1 and 13 (17.3%) had 2 prior line(s) of chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Efficacy is shown in Table. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were: hypertension 12 (17%) and anaemia 9 (13%). Dose reductions and interruptions occurred in 19 (26.4%) and 34 (47.2%) patients respectively. Conclusions: The response rate to olaparib and ceralasertib did not meet pre-specified criteria for efficacy in the overall evaluable population. Responses were observed in patients without germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations. Translational analyses are underway to identify potential biomarkers of response in this population and will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN16945804.

Response rates and median PFS.

Population
N
Number of confirmed responses
Confirmed response rate, % (95%CI)
Median PFS (IQR), months
All evaluable patients
70
12
17.1 (9.2, 28.0)
4.3 (1.9, 10.0)
BRCA1/2 germline mutation
10
3
30 (6.7, 65.2)
8.4 (6.1, 25.4)
BRCA1/2 germline or somatic mutation
13
3
23.1 (5.0, 53.8)
7.3 (4.5, 25.4)
No germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutation^
55
9
16.4 (7.8, 28.8)
3.7 (1.9, 10.0)
ATM loss*
14
3
21.4 (4.7, 50.8)
3.4 (1.4, 10.2)
No ATM loss*
29
4
13.8 (3.9, 31.7)
2.5 (1.9, 10.0)

*ATM loss defined as H score ≤10. ATM loss subgroup analysis was restricted to those with no BRCA1/2 germline or somatic mutation. 12 patients had either a missing or inadequate sample. ^2 patients did not have somatic BRCA testing.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative

Clinical Trial Registration Number

ISRCTN16945804

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1024)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1024

Abstract #

1024

Poster Bd #

402

Abstract Disclosures