The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom
Alistair E. Ring , Laura Moretti , Angelica Afshari-Mehr , Andrew M. Wardley , Lucy Kilburn , Bora Gurel , Iain R. MacPherson , Richard D. Baird , Sue Martin , Alex Pearson , Rebecca Roylance , Matthew Winter , Kathryn Dunne , Ellen Copson , Tamas Hickish , Peter Stephens , Russell J. Burcombe , Katrina Randle , Judith Bliss , Nicholas C. Turner
Background: The plasmaMATCH trial was an open label platform trial, consisting of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) testing in ̃1000 patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) linked to parallel treatment cohorts with therapies matched to mutations identified in ctDNA. Cohorts A-D have already reported (Turner N et al, Lancet Oncol 2020). Cohort E recruited patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) without a targetable mutation identified at ctDNA screening, treating with olaparib (PARP inhibitor) plus ceralasertib (ATR inhibitor). Methods: Patients with TNBC who had received 1 or 2 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease or relapsed within 12 months of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy were eligible. Treatment was olaparib 300mg b.i.d continuously and ceralasertib 160mg qd on days 1–7 on a 28 day cycle, until disease progression. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate by RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Biomarker analysis included response according to BRCA and somatic DNA repair gene status and ATM loss. Using a two-stage design with a target response rate of 25%, unacceptable response rate of 10%, alpha=2% and power=90%, ≥13 responses out of 69 evaluable stage 2 patients were required to infer efficacy (5/37 stage 1). Results: Between 17/09/18 and 5/10/20 75 patients enrolled in Cohort E of whom 70 were evaluable for response. The median age was 55.6 years. 42 (56%) patients had 1 and 13 (17.3%) had 2 prior line(s) of chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Efficacy is shown in Table. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were: hypertension 12 (17%) and anaemia 9 (13%). Dose reductions and interruptions occurred in 19 (26.4%) and 34 (47.2%) patients respectively. Conclusions: The response rate to olaparib and ceralasertib did not meet pre-specified criteria for efficacy in the overall evaluable population. Responses were observed in patients without germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutations. Translational analyses are underway to identify potential biomarkers of response in this population and will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: ISRCTN16945804.
Population | N | Number of confirmed responses | Confirmed response rate, % (95%CI) | Median PFS (IQR), months |
---|---|---|---|---|
All evaluable patients | 70 | 12 | 17.1 (9.2, 28.0) | 4.3 (1.9, 10.0) |
BRCA1/2 germline mutation | 10 | 3 | 30 (6.7, 65.2) | 8.4 (6.1, 25.4) |
BRCA1/2 germline or somatic mutation | 13 | 3 | 23.1 (5.0, 53.8) | 7.3 (4.5, 25.4) |
No germline or somatic BRCA1/2 mutation^ | 55 | 9 | 16.4 (7.8, 28.8) | 3.7 (1.9, 10.0) |
ATM loss* | 14 | 3 | 21.4 (4.7, 50.8) | 3.4 (1.4, 10.2) |
No ATM loss* | 29 | 4 | 13.8 (3.9, 31.7) | 2.5 (1.9, 10.0) |
*ATM loss defined as H score ≤10. ATM loss subgroup analysis was restricted to those with no BRCA1/2 germline or somatic mutation. 12 patients had either a missing or inadequate sample. ^2 patients did not have somatic BRCA testing.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Katrin Marie Sjoquist
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Natalie I Vokes
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Maha H. A. Hussain
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nashat Gabrail