Benefits, harms, and burden of colorectal cancer screening among childhood cancer survivors previously treated with abdominal-pelvic radiation.

Authors

null

Jennifer M Yeh

Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Jennifer M Yeh , Claudia L. Seguin , Jillian Whitton , Wendy M. Leisenring , Gregory T. Armstrong , Tara O. Henderson , Melissa M. Hudson , Paul C. Nathan , Joseph Philip Neglia , Kevin C. Oeffinger , Lisa Diller , Amy B Knudsen

Organizations

Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, Duke University, Durham, NC, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Other Foundation
U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Survivors of childhood cancer treated with abdominal-pelvic radiation are at increased risk for colorectal cancer (CRC). The Children’s Oncology Group recommends early initiation of CRC screening at age 30, yet the benefits and burden are unknown. Methods: We used incidence and mortality data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study to modify the SimCRC model from the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) to reflect high CRC and competing mortality risks among survivors, assuming the elevated cancer risk arises from higher adenoma onset. Strategies evaluated varied by modality (no screening, colonoscopy, multitarget stool DNA [mtsDNA] testing, fecal immunochemical testing [FIT]), screening start age (25, 30, 35, 40, 45) and screening interval (every 3, 5 or 10 yrs for colonoscopy; every 1, 2 or 3 yrs for mtsDNA and FIT). Abnormal stool test results were followed up with colonoscopy. Screening performance and complication rates were based on published studies. Analyses assumed full uptake and adherence to all screening and follow-up procedures. To identify the optimal strategy for each modality, we estimated the number of colonoscopies required per additional life-year gained and compared it to benchmarks for screening strategies recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force for average-risk individuals. Results: Among a simulated cohort of 20-yr-old 5-yr survivors with a history of abdominal-pelvic radiation, the cumulative CRC risk at age 50 was 0.8%, approximately twice that predicted among general population average-risk individuals (0.4%). In the absence of screening, 73 per 1000 survivors would be diagnosed with CRC in their lifetime and 29 would die from the disease. All screening strategies evaluated were estimated to yield substantial reductions in the lifetime number of CRC cases (45-71 cases averted per 1000) and deaths (23-28 deaths averted per 1000). The estimated lifetime number of colonoscopies ranged from 1781 to 14,625 per 1000. The lifetime number of colonoscopy complications was relatively low at 9 to 20 per 1000. Based on the burden-to-benefit ratios, colonoscopy every 10 yrs starting at age 30, mtsDNA every 3 yrs starting at age 30, or FIT every 3 yrs starting at age 25 were the optimal screening strategies identified (Table). Conclusions: Early initiation of screening may substantially reduce CRC mortality among high-risk childhood cancer survivors. These estimates of the balance of screening benefits and burden can inform follow-up care guidelines.

Model results per 1000 survivors for optimal screening strategies*.

Strategy
Benefits
Burden
Harms
CRC cases averted
CRC deaths averted
Life-years gained
Colonoscopies
Colonoscopy complications
Colonoscopy,

age 30, every 10y
61
26
342
4373
10
mtsDNA

age 30, every 3y
53
25
333
2457
9
FIT

age 25, every 3y
53
26
334
2190
9

*Compared to no screening

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Pediatric Oncology

Track

Pediatric Oncology

Sub Track

Survivorship

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 10015)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.10015

Abstract #

10015

Poster Bd #

230

Abstract Disclosures