Financial impact of immunotherapy-related adverse events among inpatient admissions with solid malignancies.

Authors

Rayli Pichardo

Rayli Pichardo

Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI

Rayli Pichardo , Yazan Abu Omar , Ding Wang

Organizations

Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ and Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI

Research Funding

Other

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICPis) have shifted the landscape of cancer treatment from conventional cytotoxic regimens. The mechanism of action involves suppression of immunologic checkpoints that often results on a unique spectrum of side effects associated with immune-mediated inflammations. The Aim of this study is to evaluate the financial impact from immune-related adverse events (IrAEs) reflected in hospitalized patients undergoing anti-neoplastic immunotherapy using the data from a nation-wide database. Methods: We performed retrospective analysis with the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using ICD10-CM and PCS codes to identify patients with solid tumors hospitalized for immunotherapy between October 2015 and 2018. Inpatient data from patients with or without having developed IrAEs during the hospitalizations were compared in this study. IRAEs included systemic symptoms, diarrhea/colitis, hepatic and endocrine adverse events. Baseline characteristics and inpatient complication variables were collected and analyzed between these two groups. Results: From 5,795 admissions of ICPi-treated cancer patients, 1,160 patients or 20 % of these hospitalizations presented with IrAEs, females represented (37.5%) with an age of 57 years though not statistically different from admissions without IrAE. On the other hand, length of stay was statistically longer (7 vs 5 days, p < 0.05) with higher admission expenses ($184,255 vs $ 133,305, p < 0.05) from IRAE-associated admissions. Higher IrAEs were observed among patients who were ICPi-treated for genitourinary (GU) cancers (22% vs 15%, p < 0.05). IRAE as an independent risk factor was associated with higher costs even when adjusted for other risk factors, significantly contributed to a higher admission expenses by a coefficient at $46,624 (SE +/- $13,943). Conclusions: Although ICPi-therapies have offered various clinical benefits among cancer patients. They have also contributed to both direct and indirect costs of cancer management. Our analysis showed a higher IrAE incidence associated with ICPi-treated GU cancer patients, patients who developed IRAEs had a longer hospital stay and higher in-hospital mortality, resulting in higher care expenses as one of the indirect financial burdens of ICPi therapies, no differences were observed between gender, race, or income.


Variable
No IRAE
IRAE
p value
Female
38.42%
37.50%
0.8
Age
55.83
57.35
0.1
LOS
5.00
6.82
0
Total Charges
$ 132,305
$ 184,255
0
Cancer Type
0.003
Other
66.67%
51.72%
Lung
14.89%
16.81%
GU
14.67%
21.98%
Melanoma
3.78%
9.48%
Using IRAE as a predictor for in-hospital outcomes.

Coefficient (or Odds ratio)
SE
P value
Total charges (crude)
$ 51,949
$ 14,470
0
Total charges (Adjusted)
$ 46,624
$ 13,943
0.001
LOS (Crude)
1.8
0.5
0
LOS (Adjusted)
1.6
0.5
0
Mortality (Crude)
1.00326
1.128155
0.9
Mortality (Adjusted)
1.26001
1.825277
0.8

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr e18825)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e18825

Abstract #

e18825

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts