Whole transcriptome analysis of tumors with discordant oncotype and MammaPrint results in the FLEX trial.

Authors

null

Matei P. Socoteanu

Texas Oncology-Longview Cancer Center, US Oncology, Longview, TX

Matei P. Socoteanu , Joyce O'Shaughnessy , Kent Hoskins , Adam Brufsky , Cathy Lynne Graham , Svetislava J. Vukelja , Jamal Ghazi Misleh , Karen L. Tedesco , Rakhshanda Layeequr Rahman , June Lee , Julian Berrocal , Kamal Sharma , Albert Begas , Jennifer Crozier , Ian Grady , Nina D'Abreo , Midas M. Kuilman , Holly Nguyen , Lisa Eileen Blumencranz , M. William Audeh

Organizations

Texas Oncology-Longview Cancer Center, US Oncology, Longview, TX, Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network, Dallas, TX, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, US Oncology Research, and Texas Oncology - Tyler Cancer Center, Tyler, TX, Medical Oncology Hematology Consultants PA, Newark, DE, New York Oncology Hematology-Albany, US Oncology, Albany, NY, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Breast Center of Excellence, Amarillo, TX, Breast Specialists of South Florida, Atlantis, FL, Women's Health and Healing of the Palm Beaches, Palm Springs, FL, Natl Cancer Inst Natl Inst of Health, State College, PA, Lynn Reg Cancer Ctr, Boca Raton, FL, Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, North Valley Breast Clinic, Redding, CA, NYU Winthrop Hospital, Mineola, NY, Research and Development, Agendia NV, Amsterdam, Netherlands, Agendia, Irvine, CA, Medical Affairs, Agendia, Inc., Irvine, CA, Cedars Sinai Outpatient Cancer Ctr, Los Angeles, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Genomic tests, such as MammaPrint (MP) and Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score (RS), assess risk of recurrence in patients with early breast cancer (EBC). Using both assays may yield discordant results which leads to uncertainty in treatment recommendations. The assays differ in technology and genes analyzed. RS relies on RT-PCR to query 16 cancer-related genes and 5 controls. MP uses a microarray to query 70 cancer-related genes and 465 normalization controls. Here we explore the genetic basis for discordance by using the FLEX whole transcriptome database to examine differentially expressed genes among patients who received discordant RS and MP results. Methods: Patients with EBC enrolled in the FLEX study (NCT03053193) undergo standard of care MP and BluePrint (BP) tests, and consent to clinically annotated whole transcriptome data collection. MP stratifies risk of recurrence as Low risk and High. RS classifies patients as Low Risk (RS 0-10), Intermediate (RS 11-25), and High Risk (RS 26-100). Due to low representation of BP Basal and BP HER2-type tumors in this data set, we only examined BP Luminal-type tumors (N = 705). We used full genome transcriptomes to compare gene expression among discordant cases. Gene expression data were quantile normalized and analyzed using R package ‘limma’. Genes were considered differentially expressed at a fold change of at least 1.7 and an adjusted p-value of lower than 0.05. To keep the analysis as unbiased as possible, comparisons between RS categories only included tumors within the same MP score range and similarly comparisons of MP categories only contained tumors within the same RS score range. Results: The comparisons between discordant cases, their numbers and the amount of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) are shown below. Sample sizes are shown in parentheses. Of the 49 DEGs found in the RS Intermediate group, several are associated with increased proliferation or increased metastatic potential. SCUBE2 and MMP9 were among the 49 genes and are among the 70-genes assayed by MP. Conclusions: The comparisons highlight the genomic diversity of the RS Intermediate (RS11-25) group, as seen with the high number of DEGs. MP separates cases into more genomically distinct categories, as reflected by fewer DEGs. Clinical trial information: NCT03053193.

RS Intermediate (458)
MP High (213) vs MP Low (245)
49 DEGs
MP High (297)
RS High (85) vs RS Intermediate (212)
7 DEGs
MP Low (354)
RS Intermediate (245) vs RS Low (109)
12 DEGs

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Biologic Correlates

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03053193

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 556)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.556

Abstract #

556

Poster Bd #

328

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Defining transcriptomic profiles of early-stage mucinous breast cancers: A FLEX sub study.

First Author: Abirami Sivapiragasam

Abstract

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Clinical implications for patients with discordant oncotype and MammaPrint results.

First Author: Matei P. Socoteanu

First Author: Eric Allen Brown