Cross-trial validation of molecular subtypes in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC): The JAVELIN Renal 101 experience.

Authors

null

Renee Maria Saliby

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Renee Maria Saliby , Tejas Jammihal , Chris Labaki , Wanling Xie , Robert J. Motzer , Thomas Powles , Brian I. Rini , Laurence Albiges , Sumanta K. Pal , Rana R. McKay , Sabina Signoretti , Sachet A. Shukla , Eliezer Mendel Van Allen , David A. Braun , Toni K. Choueiri

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Royal Free National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Department of Medical Oncology & Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, University of California San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) combinations are a standard in mRCC. Molecular clusters of patients have been identified and correlated with outcomes in the phase 3 IMmotion151 (IM151) trial of atezolizumab + bevacizumab (IO+VEGF) vs. sunitinib (Sun) (Motzer, Cancer Cell 2020 &JAMA Oncol 2021). Avelumab+axitinib (AA) is an approved IO+VEGF combination in mRCC. This work aims to evaluate these clusters in patients from the phase 3 JAVELIN Renal 101 (JR101; NCT02684006 ) trial of AA vs. Sun. Methods: Bulk RNA-sequencing of primary and metastatic samples and clinical data (data cutoff: 28 January 2019) from JR101 were obtained. A random forest model designed to predict molecular clusters based on transcriptomic data was trained on the IM151 dataset. Using this model, patients from JR101 study were categorized into previously defined molecular subgroups. We then evaluated treatment outcomes including progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) from JR101 in relation to molecular subgroups. Results: The proportion of patients in each molecular subtype and across MSKCC risk groups were largely comparable between the 2 trials (accuracy: 81.6%; p=0.2). AA was generally superior to Sun. for PFS and ORR across all molecular subsets, including angiogenic and immune-based clusters (Table). Combining immune and/or cell cycle-enriched clusters 4+5 resulted in improved PFS (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.44-0.97) for AA vs. Sun. Conclusions: We were able to largely validate the molecular clusters classification and some of the associations with survival outcomes from IM151 in the JR101 clinical trial cohort. Biomarkers of specific VEGF+IO combinations in mRCC should be prospectively validated in randomized trials.

Treatment outcomes from the JR101 trial in relation to previously defined molecular clusters.

Molecular Clusters
N AA/Sun
PFS median AA/Sun
PFS HR (95% CI)
2-year OS AA/Sun
OS HR (95% CI)
ORR % AA/Sun
Overall
356/376
13.3/8
0.69 (0.57–0.83)
0.63/0.62
0.80 (0.62–1.03)
53/27
1-Angiogenic/Stromal
40/41
15.1/7
0.55 (0.31-0.97)
0.75/0.72
0.77 (0.29-2.07)
60/29
2-Angiogenic
113/106
19.4/15.4
0.91 (0.61-1.35)
0.81/0.75
0.75 (0.41-1.35)
60/34
3-Complement/Oxidation
86/89
12.5/7.1
0.65 (0.43-0.97)
0.83/0.69
0.56 (0.28-1.11)
58/32
4-T-eff/Prolif
47/69
20.6/6.9
0.54 (0.32-0.91)
0.63/0.62
0.96 (0.47-1.94)
53/24
5-Proliferative
32/26
5.7/8.4
0.83 (0.44-1.57)
0.43/0.55
0.97 (0.43-2.19)
40/15
6-Stromal/Prolif
38/45
4.2/2.9
0.75 (0.44-1.26)
0.37/0.46
0.95 (0.49-1.86)
44/17
Clusters 1+2
153/147
16.6/11.2
0.78 (0.57-1.08)
0.79/0.74
0.74 (0.45-1.23)
60/33
4+5
79/95
12.5/8.2
0.65 (0.44-0.97)
0.55/0.60
1.11 (0.66-1.87)
48/22

Cluster 7 separately was excluded as it contains 1 patient per treatment arm.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 4531)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.4531

Abstract #

4531

Poster Bd #

22

Abstract Disclosures