Estradiol (E2) levels in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) on ovarian function suppression (OFS) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa).

Authors

Megan Tesch

Megan Elizabeth Tesch

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Megan Elizabeth Tesch , Yue Zheng , Shoshana M. Rosenberg , Philip Daniel Poorvu , Kathryn Jean Ruddy , Rulla Tamimi , Lidia Schapira , Jeffrey M. Peppercorn , Virginia F. Borges , Steven E. Come , Craig Snow , Ann H. Partridge

Organizations

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Other Foundation

Background: OFS is an important treatment component for premenopausal women with early and advanced HR+ BC and optimal efficacy may depend on complete E2 suppression with GnRHa, especially when combined with aromatase inhibitors (AI). However, standard assays lack sensitivity and accuracy at very low E2 concentrations, rendering detection of breakthrough ovarian function challenging. More informative data regarding endocrine effects of GnRHa are needed, particularly in young women who derive the most benefit from OFS yet more frequently had breakthrough E2 levels in the SOFT trial substudy, SOFT-EST. Methods: Using a prospective cohort study of women with BC diagnosed at age ≤ 40 years, we identified participants with stage I-IV HR+ BC on OFS treatment with leuprolide, goserelin or triptorelin and blood collected 1 year after diagnosis. Clinical data were obtained through surveys and medical records. Plasma estrogens were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, with a limit of detection of 0.2 pg/mL compared to 10 pg/mL with standard assays. We assessed the proportion of women on OFS with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL (10 pmol/L) and > 10 pg/mL. Patient characteristics, estrone (E1) and FSH levels, and disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between those with and without elevated E2 using Fischer’s exact, Wilcoxon rank sum and log rank tests, respectively. Results: Of 84 patients who met inclusion criteria, 72 (86%) had stage I-III and 12 (14%) had stage IV BC; 25 were on OFS plus AI and 59 were on OFS plus tamoxifen (TAM). Median E2 was 3.1 pg/mL (range 0.2-30.9). 46 patients (55%) had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL, including 8 on AI and 38 on TAM; 4 (5%) had E2 > 10 pg/mL, including 1 on AI and 3 on TAM. Factors associated with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL were no prior chemotherapy, TAM and high E1 (P ≤.05), but not age, BMI or GnRHa schedule (Table). After a median follow-up of 7 years, DFS events were seen in 6 patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 without (P =.232); OS events were seen in 7 patients with E2 > 2.72 pg/mL and 5 without (P =.608). Conclusions: More than half of young women with ER+ BC had E2 > 2.72 pg/mL on OFS, 91% of whom would not have been detected by standard assays. This may be an area amenable to intervention to improve outcomes in young women. However, larger studies are needed to elucidate the optimal E2 target on OFS and clinical implications of incomplete E2 suppression on ultrasensitive assays.


E2 ≤ 2.72 pg/mL

(n = 38)
E2 > 2.72 pg/mL

(n = 46)
P
Age, median (range)
35 (26-40)
36 (17-40)
.808
BMI, median (range)
23 (16-45)
24 (19-35)
.211
Prior chemotherapy, n (%)
27 (71)
22 (48)
.045
GnRHa monthly, n (%)*
23 (61)
24 (52)
.485
trimonthly
13 (34)
21 (46)

Concurrent AI, n (%)
17 (45)
8 (17)
.009
TAM
21 (55)
38 (83)

E1 (pg/mL), median (range)
5.1 (0.2-29)
14.0 (0.2-43.4)
<.001
FSH (IU/L), median (range)
4.1 (1.5-85.4)
3.0 (1.2-87.7)
.321

*n = 3 missing data

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Adjuvant Therapy

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 524)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.524

Abstract #

524

Poster Bd #

296

Abstract Disclosures