Safety and efficacy of MORAb-202 in patients (pts) with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (PROC): Results from the expansion part of a phase 1 trial.

Authors

Shin Nishio

Shin Nishio

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan

Shin Nishio , Mayu Yunokawa , Koji Matsumoto , Kazuhiro Takehara , Kosei Hasegawa , Yasuyuki Hirashima , Hidenori Kato , Hiroki Ikezawa , Maiko Nomoto , Seiichi Hayato , Yohei Otake , Takuma Miura , Kan Yonemori

Organizations

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, Division of Medical Oncology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Ehime, Japan, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan, Department of Gynecology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan, Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan, Eisai Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: MORAb-202 is an antibody-drug conjugate consisting of farletuzumab (an antibody that binds to folate receptor alpha [FRα]) paired with eribulin mesylate (a microtubule dynamics inhibitor) conjugated via a cathepsin-B–cleavable linker. The dose-escalation part of this phase 1 study confirmed antitumor activity in pts with ovarian cancer (Shimizu 2021, CCR); based on efficacy and safety, MORAb-202 0.9 mg/kg and 1.2 mg/kg Q3W were chosen as doses for the expansion part of this study in pts with PROC. Methods: The primary objective for the expansion part of this phase 1 study conducted in Japan was to define the safety and tolerability of MORAb-202. Secondary objectives included PK characterization and efficacy assessment (best overall response, objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival). Eligible pts included those who had received ≤2 regimens of chemotherapy after diagnosis of PROC, had measurable disease per RECIST v1.1, and an ECOG PS of ≤1. Pts (except those with high grade serous histology) in the expansion phase were required to be FRα positive. The expansion phase began at the 0.9 mg/kg dose (Cohort 1); Cohort 2 (1.2 mg/kg) was initiated after safety assessment of Cohort 1 was completed. Tumor responses were assessed per RECIST v1.1 by investigator. Results: Twenty-four pts were treated in Cohort 1 and 21 pts were treated in Cohort 2. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 33.3% of pts in Cohort 1 and 28.6% of pts in Cohort 2. The most common TEAE was interstitial lung disease (ILD)/pneumonitis at both dose levels (Cohort 1: 37.5% [n=9; 8 with grade 1, 1 with grade 2]; Cohort 2: 66.7% [n=14; 6 with grade 1, 7 with grade 2, 1 with grade 3]). Other common TEAEs of any grade were nausea (25.0%; 33.3%), pyrexia (33.3%; 42.9%), malaise (16.7%; 28.6%), and headache (12.5%; 47.6%), in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively. ORR was 25.0% and 52.4% in Cohorts 1 and 2, respectively (Table). Antitumor activity was observed across FRα-expression levels (<50% and ≥50%) and will be presented. Conclusions: In the PROC population, antitumor activity was seen with both the MORAb-202 0.9 mg/kg and 1.2 mg/kg doses. While pt numbers were small, efficacy was observed irrespective of FRα-expression levels. ILD/pneumonitis was the most common TEAE and was low grade in most pts. Dose optimization is ongoing to maximize the benefit/risk profile of MORAb-202. Clinical trial information: NCT03386942.

Parameter
Cohort 1

MORAb-202 0.9 mg/kg

(n=24)
Cohort 2

MORAb-202 1.2 mg/kg

(n=21)
CR, n (%)
1 (4.2)
0
PR, n (%)
5 (20.8)
11 (52.4)
SD, n (%)
10 (41.7)
9 (42.9)
PD, n (%)
8 (33.3)
1 (4.8)
ORR, n (%), (95% CI)a
6 (25.0), (9.8–46.7)
11 (52.4), (29.8–74.3)
DCR, n (%), (95% CI)a
16 (66.7), (44.7–84.4)
20 (95.2), (76.2–99.9)
Median PFS, mos (95% CI)a
6.7 (1.5–12.0)
8.2 (4.2–10.4)
Median OS, mos (95% CI)a
10.5 (6.4–15.1)
NE (12.5–NE)

aCI calculations: ORR, DCR—Clopper-Pearson's exact method; PFS, OS—Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Ovarian Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03386942

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 5513)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5513

Abstract #

5513

Poster Bd #

392

Abstract Disclosures