Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) in patients (pts) with previously treated, metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC): Final results from the phase 3 ASCENT study.

Authors

Aditya Bardia

Aditya Bardia

Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Aditya Bardia , Sara M. Tolaney , Delphine Loirat , Kevin Punie , Mafalda Oliveira , Hope S. Rugo , Adam Brufsky , Kevin Kalinsky , Javier Cortes , Joyce O'Shaughnessy , Veronique C Dieras , Lisa A. Carey , Luca Gianni , Martine J. Piccart-Gebhart , Sibylle Loibl , Yanni Zhu , See-Chun Phan , Sara A. Hurvitz

Organizations

Department of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Medical Oncology Department and D3i, Institut Curie, Paris, France, Department of General Medical Oncology and Multidisciplinary Breast Centre, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, International Breast Cancer Center, Quiron Group, Barcelona, Spain, Baylor University Medical Center, Texas Oncology, US Oncology Network, Dallas, TX, Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC, Medical Oncology, Gianni Bonadonna Foundation, Milan, Italy, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium, Department of Medicine and Research, Hämatologisch-Onkologische Gemeinschaftspraxis am Bethanien-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany, Department of Clinical Development, Gilead Sciences Inc., Foster City, CA, Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Treatment goals for pts with metastatic breast cancer include extended survival and improved quality of life (QoL). SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG received FDA approval for pts with mTNBC who received ≥2 prior chemotherapies (at least 1 in the metastatic setting). In the pivotal phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455), SG demonstrated a significant survival benefit over single-agent chemotherapy TPC in the primary analysis population of pts with second line or greater (2L+) mTNBC without known brain metastases at baseline (Bardia A et al. NEJM 2021) and QoL (Loibl S. et al. ESMO 2021). With additional follow up, we present the final data on efficacy, including overall survival (OS), safety, and QoL. Methods: Pts with mTNBC refractory or relapsing after ≥2 prior chemotherapies with at least 1 in the metastatic setting were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or TPC (capecitabine, eribulin, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 by independent review in pts without known brain metastases at baseline. Key secondary endpoints included OS, safety, and health-related QoL. Safety was analyzed in pts who received ≥1 dose of study drug. Results: Of 529 pts enrolled, 468 did not have known brain metastases at baseline (median age: 54 y [range, 27-82]; median prior lines: 4 [range, 2-17]). As of Feb 25, 2021 (final database lock), SG (n = 235) vs TPC (n = 233) significantly improved median PFS (5.6 vs 1.7 mo; HR: 0.39; P< 0.0001) and median OS (12.1 vs 6.7 mo; HR: 0.48; P< 0.0001). The OS rate at 24 months was 22.4% (95% CI, 16.8-28.5) in the SG arm and 5.2% (95% CI, 2.5-9.4) in the TPC arm. In the safety population (n = 482), key treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events with SG (n = 258) vs TPC (n = 224) were diarrhea (11% vs 0.4%), neutropenia (52% vs 33%), anemia (8% vs 5%), and febrile neutropenia (6% vs 2%). There was no grade ≥3 neuropathy and 1 case of grade 3 interstitial lung disease reported with SG. No patient experienced a treatment-related death with SG, and there was 1 treatment-related death with TPC due to neutropenic sepsis. Treatment discontinuations due to AEs were ≤3% in both arms. SG arm showed clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements than the TPC arm in scores for all five primary focus health-related QoL domains. Conclusions: The analysis based on the final database lock of ASCENT confirms the superior survival outcomes of SG over single-agent chemotherapy, with a manageable safety profile and improvement in QoL for pts with mTNBC in the 2L+ setting. These findings reinforce SG as an effective treatment option for this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT02574455.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Metastatic

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Triple-Negative

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02574455

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1071)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1071

Abstract #

1071

Poster Bd #

449

Abstract Disclosures