Survival outcomes amongst patients with new onset diabetes preceding the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Multicenter retrospective study.

Authors

null

Chirayu Mohindroo

Department of Internal Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD

Chirayu Mohindroo , Paul Stendahl Dy , Suraj Hande , Arun A. Mavanur , Ana De Jesus-Acosta , Florencia McAllister , Asha Thomas

Organizations

Department of Internal Medicine, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, Department of Surgery, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: In patients (pts) with new-onset diabetes (NOD) above the age of 50 years, 1% are diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) within three years. Based on this, NOD has been proposed as an important factor for early diagnosis of PDAC. Research has been directed towards investigating NOD vs Type 2 diabetes and association with PDAC. Limited data exists on its impact on the survival outcomes amongst PDAC pts. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 150 pts diagnosed with a pancreatic mass at three hospitals from 2014 to 2021. NOD group consisted of pts diagnosed with Diabetes or Pre-Diabetes defined as HBA1c > 6.5% and 5.7-6.4%, respectively, within the three years prior to PDAC diagnosis. Primary aim of the study was the characterization of the impact of NOD on clinical outcomes. Results: 83 pts [mean age 68.32 yrs, 58% males, 61% white] were identified with biopsy proven PDAC, out of which, 9 (11%) pts had pre-existing Diabetes, 21 (25%) pts met the criteria for NOD group. In the NOD group whose weight was available (n = 15), 11 pts (79%) had experienced weight loss within one year of the NOD diagnosis with a median age of 68.46 yrs. No significant differences were noted between race (P = 0.36), age (P = 0.9), sex (P = 0.9), tumor location (P = 0.17), and chemotherapy received (P = 0.9) between the two groups. When comparing survival outcomes, no significant differences were noted in the metastatic cohort (n = 42, PFS HR 0.77, P = 0.4, OS HR 0.9 P = 0.7) including in the subgroup analysis for pts receiving FOLFIRINOX n = 20, PFS HR 0.59, P = 0.28, OS HR 0.66 P = 0.4) or Gemcitabine based treatment (n = 9, PFS HR 1.31, P = 0.7, OS HR 0.46 P = 0.3). In the resected cohort (n = 20), pts in the NOD group did worse than pts who did not meet the criteria with PFS 10 months vs. 18.3 months (P = 0.0058, HR 7.78), a similar trend was noticed in the OS 15.2 months vs. 28.2 months (P = 0.08 HR 2.98), but it did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Consistent with current literature, NOD preceding PDAC is distinct from Type 2 diabetes associated NOD, characterized by weight loss and occurring at a later age. Pts with NOD preceding PDAC were shown to have worse survival outcomes in the resected cohort. Larger studies need to be conducted in this context as this could have significant implications for PDAC screening and treatment.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr e16251)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.e16251

Abstract #

e16251

Abstract Disclosures