Patient efficacy in telehealth is moderated by distress among patients with cancer: A cross-sectional survey study.

Authors

null

Joseph William McCollom

Wright State University, Dayton, OH

Joseph William McCollom , Michelle Drouin , Mindy Flanagan , Rachel Pfafman

Organizations

Wright State University, Dayton, OH, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic increased the use of telehealth to reduce exposure, which was critical for patients with cancer. The extent to which patients with cancer view telehealth visits as meeting their medical needs was investigated using a cross-sectional survey. Methods: Patients currently receiving cancer treatment at a single cancer institute who had had at least one telehealth visit were emailed an online survey. Response rate was 5% (94/1944). The survey measured patients’: 1) Emotional Thermometer (i.e. distress, anger, depression, anxiety, and need for help on a 0-10 scale); 2) Telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ; 21-items with various subscales, like interaction quality; α=0.98).); and 3) Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interactions (PEPPI-5) scale (five items, e.g., “How confident are you in your ability to make the most of your visits with your doctors?”). Respondents completed the PEPPI-5 for in-person visits and for telehealth visits. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all measures. A generalized linear model was estimated predicting PEPPI-5 for telehealth visits from emotional thermometer and TUQ scores. The interaction between emotional thermometer and TUQ scores was estimated to test the hypothesis that emotional distress moderated the relationship between TUQ and efficacy in patient-provider interactions during telehealth visits. Results: Across all five thermometers, 30.8% (28/91) reported a high score on at least one metric. The most frequently reported high score was for anxiety, 23.3% (21/90) and least frequently reported high score was for anger, 12.2% (11/90). The mean TUQ score was 5.5 (SD=1.5) and mean PEPPI-5 score for telehealth visits was 8.1 (SD=2.4). As shown in Table, emotional thermometer scores did moderate the relation between TUQ and patient self-efficacy during telehealth visits. For high emotional thermometer scores, self-efficacy decreased as TUQ scores decreased. Conclusions: For patients experiencing high emotional distress, low comfort and ability with telehealth usability resulted in low patient self-efficacy in communicating with providers and getting medical needs met. Telehealth is a convenient and effective modality; however, in times of emotional distress for patients who are not familiar with telehealth, in-person clinic visits may result in greater patient self-efficacy.

Summary results from generalized linear model estimating patient efficacy during telehealth visits.

Parameter
Estimate
Standard Error
t-Value
P-value
Intercept0.041.410.03.97
TUQ1.390.255.58<.0001
Emotional Thermometer (low)6.031.803.35.001
TUQ X Emotional Thermometer-1.000.32-3.15.002

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Telemedicine/Remote Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1590)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.1590

Abstract #

1590

Poster Bd #

182

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Preeti Kakani

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Reducing stress and anxiety in cancer patients with the use of virtual reality.

First Author: Zeeshan Muzammil