Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC
Hamid Ehsan , Adeel Masood , Ahsan Wahab , Zahoor Ahmed , Diana Franco , Abdul Rafae , Muhammad Nadeem Yousaf
Background: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided RFA (EUS-RFA) is a minimally invasive emerging modality that may be an alternative to surgical resection for the management of unresectable pancreatic cancer (UPC). In this review, we highlighted the efficacy, clinical and technical success of the EUS-RFA for UPC. Methods: Studies were selected with a comprehensive search strategy for EUS-RFA and pancreatic cancer on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase databases as of October 2021. The primary outcomes were the technical (TS) and clinical success rate (CS) of the EUS-RFA procedure, while the secondary outcome was the adverse events (AEs) rate. Results: Twelve studies including 114 patients with 50% (57) females were included. Common pancreatic tumors were locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LAPDAC) 38.3% (49), followed by nonfunctional neuroendocrine tumor (NNET) 32% (41), pancreatic cystic neoplastic lesions 14.8% (19), insulinoma 12.5% (16) and others 2.3% (3). The most common site of the tumor was pancreatic head 45.7% (59) followed by body, neck, and tail 47.6% (61). The average number of ablation sessions per patient was 1.4 based on the total of 115 EUS-RFA sessions performed in 84 neoplastic lesions. The pooled TS rate of EUS-RFA calculated from the total number of procedures was 99.2% [95% CI = 0.90-0.98, I2 = 0%]. The pooled CS rate calculated from the total number of pancreatic lesions was 91.9% [95% CI = 0.77-0.92, I2 = 0%]. Clinical improvement in symptoms was reported in five studies whereas complete resolution or decrease in tumor size was reported in all studies. The pooled AEs rate was 24.6% [95% CI = 0.17-0.39, I2 = 30%]. Common AEs were abdominal pain 10.5% (12), and pancreatitis 3.5% (4). Conclusions: EUS-RFA is a promising and safe modality that can be used for the management of UPC in selected patients with a high TS (99.2%) and CS rates (91.9%). Large clinical trials are needed to identify safety, clinical outcomes, and overall survival benefits of EUS-RFA.
Studies | No of patients | Age (mean) | Size of tumor (mm) (mean) | Technical success n (%) | Clinical success n (%) | No. of adverse events n (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Resolution of symptoms | Resolution/Decrease in tumor size | Total | Early | Delayed | |||||
Arcidiacono et al. | 16 | 61.9 | 35.7 | 16/22 (73) | NA | 6/6 (100) | 9 | 5 | 4 |
Pai et al. | 7 | 69* | 35.2 | 7/7 (100) | NA | 2/2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Wang et al. | 3 | 62.7 | 37.3 | 3/3 (100) | 3/3 (100) | 3/3 (100) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Song et al. | 6 | 62* | 38 | 6/6 (100) | NA | 6/6 (100) | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Lakhtakia et al. | 3 | 45 | NA | 6/6 (100) | 3/3 (100) | 5/6 (83.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Crino et al. | 8 | 67 | 36 | 8/8 (100) | NA | 8/8 (100) | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Choi et al. | 10 | 21-70** | 20 | 10/10 (100) | 1/1 (100) | 10/10 (100) | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Scopelliti et al. | 10 | 50-71** | 49.2 | 10/10 (100) | NA | 9/10 (90) | 4 | 4 | 0 |
Barthet et al. | 12 | 59.9 | 13.1 | 14/14 (100) | NA | 13/14 (92.8) | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Oleinikov et al. | 18 | 60.4 | 14.3 | 26/27 (96.2) | 7/7 (100) | 24/25 (96) | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Dongwook et al. | 13 | 60* | 50* | 13/13 (100) | NA | 8/13 (61.5) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Pai et al. | 8 | 65* | 36.6 | 8/8 | 8/8 (100) | 8/8 (100) | 2 | 2 | 0 |
Total | 114 | - | - | 127/128 ((99.2) | 102/111 (91.9) | 28 (24.6) | 23 (20.) | 5 (3.4) |
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Xuanjun Guo
2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Davi Said Gonçalves Celso
2021 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Hamid Ehsan
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Danni Li