Adjuvant dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T) versus placebo in patients with resected stage III BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: Updated 5-year distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) analysis of COMBI-AD.

Authors

null

Dirk Schadendorf

University Hospital Essen, Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany

Dirk Schadendorf , Axel Hauschild , Mario Mandalà , John M. Kirkwood , Caroline Robert , Jean-Jacques Grob , Paul D. Nathan , Michael A. Davies , Hiya Banerjee , Rohan Shah , Mike R. Lau , Reinhard Dummer , Georgina V. Long

Organizations

University Hospital Essen, Essen and German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany, Schleswig-Holstein University Hospital, Kiel, Germany, Papa Giovanni XXIII Cancer Center Hospital, Bergamo, Italy, Melanoma Program, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Gustave Roussy and Paris-Saclay University, Villejuif-Paris, France, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, Skin Cancer Center, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: DMFS is an important endpoint for patients with stage III cutaneous melanoma, as delaying or preventing systemic disease is associated with improved clinical and patient-reported outcomes. Prior results from the phase 3 COMBI-AD trial (NCT01682083) showed 5-year DMFS rates of 65% with adjuvant D + T vs 54% with placebo (PBO; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.55; 95% CI: 0.44-0.70). An analysis of DMFS by AJCC-7 stages IIIA-C suggested a similar benefit of D + T vs PBO regardless of stage (Dummer R et al. N Engl J Med. 2020). Here, we report 5-year DMFS rates by AJCC-8 stages IIIA-D, other prognostic subgroups, and results of a regression tree analysis with DMFS. Methods: Patients with resected AJCC-7 stage III BRAFV600E/K-mutant melanoma were randomized to either D (150 mg twice daily) + T (2 mg once daily) or 2 matched PBOs for 12 months. Primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS); DMFS was a secondary endpoint. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were performed to assess the long-term benefits for DMFS rates with D + T vs PBO. The regression tree analysis (data cutoff: 5 years) for all patients (N = 870) evaluated potential prognostic/predictive factors of long-term DMFS including baseline age, sex, region, BRAF mutation type, body mass index, lactate dehydrogenase levels, ECOG, T and N categories, histology, primary tumor ulceration, treatment type, number of lymph nodes with metastases, tumor mutational burden, and interferon-gamma gene expression signature (IFN-γ GES). Results: At 5 years, DMFS rates were higher for patients with AJCC-8 stages IIIB-D disease receiving adjuvant D + T vs PBO (table). Five-year DMFS rates also favored D + T vs PBO in subgroups of patients with microscopic or macroscopic lymph node involvement (table) and those with or without primary tumor ulceration and/or in-transit metastases. A regression tree revealed T and N stage, treatment type, and IFN-γ GES as important variables defining 5-year DMFS subgroups. Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis, adjuvant D + T provided long-term DMFS benefit vs PBO in stage IIIB-D patients with resected BRAFV600E/K-mutant melanoma. Key clinical and patient factors impacting DMFS were similar to prior RFS findings (ESMO 2021; Robert C et al. Ann Oncol. 2021) and included T and N stage, treatment type, and IFN-γ GES. These results further validate the robust long-term clinical benefit of adjuvant D + T for patients with melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01682083.

Statistic
Stage
Lymph node involvement
IIIA
IIIB
IIIC
IIID
Macroscopic
Microscopic
D + T

n = 50
PBO

n = 39
D + T

n = 145
PBO

n = 154
D + T

n = 217
PBO

n = 214
D + T

n = 22
PBO

n = 17
D + T

n = 158
PBO

n = 161
D + T

n = 152
PBO

n = 157
5-year

DMFS rate, %
75.3
84.5
66.5
52.8
63.0
50.8
64.6
25.6
63.3
47.1
75.3
62.5
HR (95% CI)
1.24

(0.42-3.63)
0.56

(0.38-0.83)
0.54

(0.39-0.75)
0.20

(0.07-0.55)
0.52

(0.37-0.75)
0.49

(0.31-0.79)
Log-rank P
0.695
0.004
< 0.001
0.001
< 0.001
0.002

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Track

Melanoma/Skin Cancers

Sub Track

Biologic Correlates

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01682083

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 9563)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.9563

Abstract #

9563

Poster Bd #

156

Abstract Disclosures