Mebendazole in recurrent glioblastoma: Results of a phase 2 randomized study.

Authors

Nandini Menon

Nandini Sharrel Menon

Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India

Nandini Sharrel Menon , Abhishek Chatterjee , Raees Tonse , Amit Choudhary , Abhishek Mahajan , Ameya Puranik , Epari Sridhar , Shruti Pathak , Monica Jadhav , Zoya Peelay , Rutuja Walavalkar , Hemanth Kumar , Madala Ravi Krishna , Arun Chandrasekharan , Nikhil Pande , Tejpal Gupta , Shripad Dinanath Banavali , Rakesh Jalali , Vijay Maruti Patil

Organizations

Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India, Aster MIMS, Kozhikode, India, HCG Hospital (NCHRI), Nagpur, India, Apollo Hospital, Chennai, India

Research Funding

Other

Background: Recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) has dismal outcomes and limited treatment options. Mebendazole (MBZ) is an anti-helminthic drug with in-vivo and in-vitro activity against glioma cell lines and has been demonstrated to be well tolerated in combination with lomustine (CCNU) and temozolomide (TMZ). In this phase 2 study, we sought to determine whether the addition of MBZ to CCNU or TMZ would improve overall survival (OS) in recurrent GBM. Methods: Adult patients with ECOG PS 0-3, with recurrent glioblastoma who were not eligible for re-radiation, were randomized 1:1 between CCNU-MBZ (n = 44) and TMZ-MBZ (n = 44). The primary endpoint was OS at 9 months, selected to reflect the BELOB trial. A 9-month OS of 55% or more in any arm was hypothesized to warrant further evaluation and a value below 35% was too low to warrant further investigation. Results: At 17.4 months, 68 events for OS analysis had occurred. The 9-month overall survival was 36.6% (95%CI 22.3-51) and 45% (95%CI 29.6-59.2) in the TMZ-MBZ and CCNU-MBZ arms respectively. ECOG PS was the only independent prognostic factor impacting OS (HR-0.478 95%CI 0.268-0.851; P = 0.012). Twenty-three patients (28.6%) enrolled had an ECOG PS 2-3 with inferior outcomes (median OS-5.67, HR-2.092 95%CI 1.175-3.731). Analysis restricted to ECOG PS 0-1 (n = 65) patients revealed a 9-month OS of 39.6% (95% CI 22.4-56.3) and 57.9% (95% CI 38.7-73) in TMZ-MBZ and CCNU-MBZ arms respectively. Grade 3-5 adverse events were seen in 8 (18.6%; n = 43) and 4 (9.5%; n = 42) patients in the TMZ-MBZ and CCNU-MBZ arms respectively. Conclusions: The addition of MBZ to TMZ or CCNU failed to achieve the pre-set benchmark of 55% 9-month OS. This was probably due to 28.6% of patients with poor PS of 2-3. In patients with ECOG PS 0-1, CCNU-MBZ had a 9 month OS of 57.9% and needs to be evaluated further. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2018/01/011542.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Primary CNS Tumors–Glioma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

CTRI/2018/01/011542

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 2029)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.2029

Abstract #

2029

Poster Bd #

367

Abstract Disclosures