Efficacy and safety of the anti–PD-L1 monoclonal antibody socazolimab for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: Results from the phase I dose-escalation and expansion study.

Authors

null

Jusheng An

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

Jusheng An , Li Guiling , Jie Tang , Benjamin Xiaoyi Li , Hui Hua Xiong , Hui Qiu , Lin Luo , Li Wang , Danbo Wang , Qi Zhou , Qin Xu , Hong Lin Song , Yun Yan Zhang , Hong Ping Zhang , Rachel Ng , Zewei Zhao , Xiang Rong Dai , Yu Jie Li , Yuanjue Sun , Lingying Wu

Organizations

Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China, Department of Gynecological Oncology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China, Henan Tumor Hospital, Henan, China, Lee's Pharmaceutical Holdings Ltd, Hong Kong, China, Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, Wuhan, China, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhenzhou, China, Liaoning Cancer Hospital & Institute, Shenyang, China, Department of Gynecological Oncology, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China, Gunangxi Medical University Affiliated Tumor Hospital & Oncology Medical University, Guangxi, China, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China, Yunnan Province Tumor Hospital, Kun Ming, China, Lee's Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited, Hong Kong, China, Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: The study (NCT03676959) is an open-label, phase I study investigating the safety and efficacy of the recombinant, fully human anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody socazolimab for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Methods: Patients received socazolimab every 2 weeks until disease progression. The study was divided into a dose-escalation phase and a dose-expansion phase. Safety and tolerability were primary endpoints of the dose-escalation phase. Primary endpoints of the dose-expansion phase were safety and overall response rate (ORR) of the 5mg/kg dose. Efficacy was assessed by a third-party independent review committee (IRC) using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as the evaluation standard. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were also studied. Results: One hundred four patients were enrolled. Twelve patients were included in the dose-escalation phase, with one complete and two partial responses in the 5mg/kg treatment group. Ninety-two patients (5mg/kg) were enrolled in the dose-expansion phase, with 54 patients (59.3%) expressing baseline PD-L1-positive tumors. ORR was 15.4% (95% CI, 8.7 to 24.5%). Median PFS was 4.44 months (95% CI, 2.37 to 5.75 months), and the median OS was 14.72 months (95% CI, 9.59 to NE months). ORRs for PD-L1-positive and PD-L1-negative patients were 16.7% and 17.9%, respectively. Treatment-related grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 7.7% of patients. No treatment-related deaths had occurred. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that socazolimab has remarkable safety and efficacy for the treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer and exhibits a safety profile similar to other anti–PD-1/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies. Clinical trial information: NCT03676959.

Anti-tumor efficacy assessment by IRC evaluation.

Efficacy
5 mg/kg Dose Expansion (N = 91)
CPS < 1 (N = 28)
CPS ≥ 1 (N = 54)
CPS < 10 (N = 52)
CPS ≥ 10 (N = 30)
ORR
14 (15.4%; 8.7%, 24.5%)
5 (17.9%; 6.1%, 36.9%)
9 (16.7%; 7.9%, 29.3%)
8 (15.4%; 6.9%, 28.1%)
6 (20.0%; 7.7%, 38.6%)
PFS, months (95% CI)
4.44 (2.37, 5.75)
2.79 (1.81, 5.72)
5.29 (2.56, 10.58)
3.58 (2.00, 5.78)
7.56 (2.56, NE)
12-month PFS
28.4% (18.2%, 39.5%)
30.5% (13.8%, 49.2%)
32.5% (18.5%, 47.2%)
22.8% (10.7%, 37.7%)
45.5% (26.2%, 63.0%)
OS, months (95% CI)
14.72 (9.59, NE)
15.84 (7.10, NE)
NE (13.34, NE)
15.84 (8.54, NE)
NE (13.34, NE)
12-month OS
58.2% (45.4%, 69.0%)
59.3% (36.6%, 76.3%)
68.3% (51.4%, 80.4%)
57.2% (39.5%, 71.5%)
77.0% (55.3%, 89.1%)
TOR, months (range)
2.00 (1.64 - 3.65)
2.43 (1.84 - 3.61)
1.87 (1.64 - 3.65)
2.25 (1.74 – 3.65)
1.77 (1.64 – 2.00)

Data noted as No. (%; 95% CI) unless stated. Abbreviation: TOR, Time to Response.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gynecologic Cancer

Track

Gynecologic Cancer

Sub Track

Cervical Cancer

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03676959

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 5526)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.5526

Abstract #

5526

Poster Bd #

405

Abstract Disclosures