Cost effectiveness of adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy for RCC: Insights for patient selection from a Markov model.

Authors

null

Vidit Sharma

Mayo Clinic Department of Urology, Rochester, MN

Vidit Sharma , Kevin M Wymer , Daniel D. Joyce , James P. Moriarty , Bijan J Borah , R. Houston Thompson , Brian Addis Costello , Bradley C. Leibovich , Stephen A. Boorjian

Organizations

Mayo Clinic Department of Urology, Rochester, MN, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: KEYNOTE-564 demonstrated that adjuvant pembrolizumab after nephrectomy for high-risk clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) decreased the risk of disease progression and – albeit with immature follow-up (2 years) – found a signal of improved overall survival as well. Herein, we used extrapolations from a Markov-model, accounting for the costs and toxicities of pembrolizumab relative to its efficacy, to investigate its utility at a population level. Methods: A decision-analytic Markov Model was used to conduct a cost-utility analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo after nephrectomy for high risk RCC, using data from KEYNOTE-564 to inform model probabilities. Transition probabilities not found in KEYNOTE-564, in addition to utility values, were extracted from the literature. Base case analyses were conducted with 5-year and 15-year time horizons (using extrapolations from 2-year outcomes), and 3-week time cycles. Primary outcomes were Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), 2021 US Medicare costs, and Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000/QALY. One-way sensitivity analyses were used to identify cost-effectiveness thresholds of individual parameters while probabilistic sensitivity analyses with 100,000 Monte-Carlo simulations were used to simultaneously vary all model inputs. Results: Pembrolizumab was associated with higher QALYs and costs relative to placebo (Table). Pembrolizumab was not cost-effective at a 5-year time horizon but was cost-effective at 15 years and beyond. One-way sensitivity analysis noted that pembrolizumab became cost-effective at 5-years if: 1) its administration cost was less than $5,064 (base = $10,278) or 2) if the 5-year risk of progression was 18.8% higher in placebo vs pembrolizumab (base = 9%). Using pembrolizumab’s reported hazard ratio of 0.68 for progression from KEYNOTE-564, we estimated that pembrolizumab would be cost-effective at 5-years for all patients with a Mayo Progression Free Survival Score of 10 or higher. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis found that pembrolizumab was cost-effective for 29% and 58% of microsimulations at 5 and 15 years, respectively. Conclusions: At current prices, adjuvant pembrolizumab was not cost-effective for all trial patients at a population level at 5-years after treatment but may be cost-effective for time horizons over 15 years. Instead, adjuvant pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective only for the highest risk subsets of RCC at 5-years. Longer term trial data of progression-free survival and overall survival are necessary to confirm these extrapolations.

5-year.

QALY
COST
ICER
Cost-effective for all?
Pembrolizumab
3.80
$286,807
$326,534
No
Placebo
3.50
$187,323
REF
REF
15-year

QALY
COST
ICER
Cost-effective for all?
Pembrolizumab
8.07
$420,945
$89,802
Yes
Placebo
6.59
$287,416
REF
REF

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr 321)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.321

Abstract #

321

Poster Bd #

L3

Abstract Disclosures