Efficacy of first-line combination therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients (pts) with poor performance status (PS).

Authors

null

Lucia Carril

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

Lucia Carril , Emeline Colomba , Carmen Romero-Ferreiro , Luigi Cerbone , Raffaele Ratta , Philippe Barthélémy , Clarisse Vindry , Francois Cherifi , Elouen Boughalem , Claude Linassier , Giuseppe Fornarini , Marine Gross-Goupil , Carolina Saldana , Maria Cruz Martin Soberón , Guillermo de Velasco , Cristina Pernaut , Carolina Alves Costa Silva , Ronan Flippot , Bernard Escudier , Laurence Albiges

Organizations

Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Gustave Roussy Cancerology Institute, Villejuif, France, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Departement de Medicine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France, Leon Bernard Center, Lyon, France, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France, Centre Paul Papin, Angers, France, Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Bretonneau Centre, Tours University, France, Tours, France, Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France, AP-HP Henri Mondor Hospital, Créteil, France, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Department of Oncology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Medical Oncology Department, Madrid, Spain, Institute Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: Immune checkpoint combination therapy (ICI-combo) is the new standard of care for mRCC in first-line setting. However, pts with poor PS (≥2) were excluded from pivotal trials. Hence, the activity and safety of ICI-combo in this group of pts is still unknown. Methods: We performed a multicentre retrospective study of PS≥2 mRCC pts who received ICI-combo, either nivolumab-ipilimumab (NI) or pembrolizumab-axitinib (PA) as first-line treatment between 2017-2021. Patient’s characteristics, clinical outcomes and toxicity were retrospectively reviewed. We analysed overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (G≥3 AEs) in pts treated with NI or PA. The association between LIPI (Lung Immune Prognostic Index) and ORR, PFS and OS was also evaluated. Results: We identified 56 mRCC pts with PS≥2 treated with ICI-combo across 13 institutions. Thirty-six and 20 pts were treated with NI and PA respectively. Median age at diagnosis was 64 (31-83) years, 38 (68%) were male, 16 (29%) had prior nephrectomy and 40 (71%) had synchronous metastatic disease at diagnosis. Respectively, 19 (34%) and 37 (66%) pts were intermediate and poor risk according to IMDC. Fifty pts (89%) were clear cell RCC, and only 4 pts had sarcomatoid features reported. At the time of analysis (median follow-up 11.1 months(mo)) 45% pts were dead. The ORR for the entire cohort was 27%; ORR was numerically higher with PA (42%) than with NI (20%) but did not reach statistical significancy (p=0.157). Median PFS (mPFS) and mOS in the entire cohort were 4.4 mo and 15.9 mo respectively. No significant differences in PFS, OS or the rate of G≥3AEs were seen between the NI and PA groups. Efficacy and toxicity outcomes are described in the table below. No significant differences in OS or PFS according to the IMDC risk score were observed (p=0.818). However, LIPI was significantly associated with OS (poor LIPI: HR=8.18; p=0.004) and PFS (Intermediate LIPI: HR=2.4; p=0.048 and poor LIPI: HR=8.59; p<0.001). LIPI was predictive of response in patients treated with NI (p=0.024). Conclusions: We report the first cohort of PS≥2 mRCC pts treated with ICI-combo in first-line setting. No significant differences in ORR, PFS or OS were seen between NI and PA. LIPI was significantly associated with both OS and PFS, and was predictive of ORR in the NI group. Prospective real-world studies are needed to confirm these results.

Systemic treatment
N
ORR

(%)
P-value
DCR

(%)
P-value
mPFS (mo)
P- value
mOS (mo)
P- value
G≥3 AEs (%)
P-value
Pembrolizumab-axitinib
20
42*
0.157
58
0.440
5.4
0.534
NR
0.362
24
1.0
Nivolumab-ipilimumab
36
20#
43
3.8
9.8
22

*19/20 evaluable for response; # 35/36 evaluable for response.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr 320)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.320

Abstract #

320

Poster Bd #

E9

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts