DNA damaging therapies in patients (pts) with prostate cancer (PC) and pathogenic alterations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes.

Authors

null

Laura Graham

Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO

Laura Graham , Edward Green , Joseph J. Park , Olesia Kellezi , Clara Hwang , Pedro C. Barata , Mehmet Asim Bilen , Deepak Kilari , Melissa Clingerman , Abhishek Tripathi , Matthew Labriola , Shoshana Rothstein , Rohan Garje , Vadim S Koshkin , Vaibhav G. Patel , Tanya B. Dorff , Andrew J. Armstrong , Rana R. McKay , Ajjai Shivaram Alva , Michael Thomas Schweizer

Organizations

Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, UMHS, Ann Arbor, MI, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Department of Medicine, Froedtert Cancer Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, University of California San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, Tisch Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate & Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Pathogenic HRR gene mutations may confer sensitivity to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) and/or platinum chemotherapy (chemo). While pts harboring mutations in BRCA1/2 appear to benefit from these DNA damaging therapeutics, outcomes data for those with non-BRCA1/2 mutations are less robust. We evaluated outcomes in men with HRR gene-mutated PC who received treatment with PARPi and/or platinum-based chemo stratified by type of HRR alteration. Methods: Retrospective data from the PROMISE Consortium was utilized (PMID: 34363009). PC pts with pathogenic HRR mutations who received PARPi and/or platinum-based chemo were included. Differences in PSA progression-free survival (PFS), clinical/radiographic PFS (rPFS), and overall survival (OS) between those with BRCA1/2 mutations (Cohort A) and those with mutations in HRR genes that do not directly interact with the BRCA complex (Cohort B: ATM, CDK12, CHEK1, CHEK2, FANCL) were evaluated. We also evaluated outcomes in pts with HRR gene mutations known to interact with the BRCA complex aside from BRCA1/2 (Cohort C: RAD51B/C/D, RAD54L2, BARD1, GEN1, PALB2, FANCA, BRIP1). Results: Of 361 pts identified with HRR gene alterations, 89 received PARPi and 70 received platinum-based chemo. Prior therapy and metastatic disease sites were similar between cohorts. PSA PFS, rPFS, and OS were significantly improved in Cohort A vs. Cohort B with PARPi but not platinum-based chemo (Table). Sample size in cohort C was too small to allow for statistical comparison, although PSA PFS, PFS and OS were reasonably long. Conclusions: PC pts with BRCA1/2 mutations had improved outcomes to PARPi compared to those with mutations in HRR genes not directly interacting with the BRCA complex. Platinum-based chemo appeared effective regardless of which HRR gene was affected.

Outcomes to DNA damaging therapies.

PARPi
Platinum-based chemotherapy#
Cohort A
N=58
Cohort B
N=27
Cohort C
N=4
Cohort A
N=32
Cohort B*
N=31
Cohort C
N=7
Prior PARPi or platinum chemotherapy, N (%)
11 (19)
7 (26)
0
5 (16)
3 (10)
0
Prior Taxane, N (%)
39 (67)
17 (63)
2 (50)
19 (59)
23 (74)
5 (71)
Prior AR-Targeted Therapy, N(%)
51 (88)
26 (96)
4 (100)
24 (75)
26 (84)
6 (86)
Visceral Metastases, N(%)
10 (17)
3 (11)
2 (50)
8 (25)
7 (23)
3 (43)
Median PSA PFS, Months (IQR)
6.4 (3.0-12.0)
2.5 (1.3-3.4), *P<0.001
8.3 (3.6-13.0)
5.3 (3.4-12.0)
5.2 (3.0-7.2), *P=0.09
6.9 (3.1-28.0)
Median PFS (IQR)
9.2 (3.7-14.8)
2.9 (1.4-4.3), *P=0.014
8.3 (3.6-13.0)
6.0 (3.4-13.4)
5.2 (2.3-7.5), *P=0.10
10.3 (3.1-28.0)
Median OS, Months (IQR)
10.7 (4.0-17.0)
3.6 (2.9-8.3), *P=0.018
8.3 (3.6-13.0)
8.1 (4.0-19.2)
6.6 (4.6-10.9), *P=0.14
10.9 (10.3-28.0)

IQR= interquartile range *Logrank P-value comparing A vs. B #N=36 cases concurrent with a taxane †Prior platinum-based chemotherapy in pts treated with PARPi and prior PARPi for pts treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Prostate Cancer

Track

Prostate Cancer - Advanced,Prostate Cancer - Localized

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr 129)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.129

Abstract #

129

Poster Bd #

G4

Abstract Disclosures