Immuno-oncology (IO) combinations +/- VEGF targeted therapy (VEGF TT) in patients (pts) with advanced mit family translocation renal cell carcinomas (tRCC): Results from an international multicenter study.

Authors

Omar Alhalabi

Omar Alhalabi

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Omar Alhalabi , Jonathan Thouvenin , Sylvie Negrier , Yann-Alexandre Vano , Luca Campedel Jr., Elshad Hasanov , Ziad Bakouny , Andrew Warren Hahn , Mehmet Asim Bilen , Toni K. Choueiri , Srinivas Raghavan Viswanathan , Kanishka Sircar , Laurence Albiges , Gabriel Malouf , Nizar M. Tannir

Organizations

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France, Departement of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, University Lyon I, Lyon, France, Department of Medical Oncology, Georges Pompidou Hospital, University Paris Descartes, Paris, France, Department of Medical Oncology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitie-Salpetriere, University Pierre and Marie Curie (Paris VI), Institut Universitaire de Cancerologie, Paris, France, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Boston, MA, Dana Farber Cancer Inst, Cambridge, MA, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France, Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Strasbourg (ICANS), Strasbourg, France, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: IO combinations are standard of care for first-line therapy of clear-cell RCC; however, non-clear cell histologies including tRCC were not included in the registrational trials. We previously reported a modest efficacy (objective response rate [ORR] <20%) with IO monotherapy (PD-1 blockade) in tRCC (Boilève et al, JITC. 2018). The efficacy of IO combinations +/- VEGF TT has not been reported. Methods: This is a retrospective, international, multicenter study of pts with tRCC treated with IO-IO or IO+VEGF TT at 11 centers in the US, France, and Belgium. Only pts with confirmed TFE3 or TFEB translocation by fluorescent-in-situ hybridization (FISH) were included. ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by RECIST. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods. OS was measured from initiation of therapy till death or last follow up. We also assessed the association between OS and baseline prognostic variables. Results: 29 patients with metastatic tRCC were included in this analysis. Median age at starting therapy was 38 (IQR 27, 53) years. Female:Male ratio was 0.9:1. FISH revealed a translocation involving TFE3 and TFEB in 22 and 7 patients, respectively. Most frequent metastatic sites at diagnosis were lungs (76%), liver (52%), retroperitoneal adenopathy (48%), and bone (38%). IMDC risk at diagnosis was favorable (31%), intermediate (45%) and poor (24%). Combinations of IO+VEGF TT and anti-PD1 (L1) + anti-CTLA-4 (IO+IO) were used in 11 and 18 pts, respectively. 17 (59%) pts received IO combinations as 1L, 7 (24%) pts as 2L and 5 (17%) pts as ≥3L. ORR in the IO+IO group was 1/18 (5.5%), while in IO+VEGF TT group was 4/11 (36%). For 20 (69%) pts, progressive disease was the best overall response. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months (mo), median PFS was 3.2 mo and median OS was 13.5 mo for all 29 pts (Table). Median PFS in the IO+IO group was 2.8 mo, and 5.4 mo in IO+VEGF TT group (HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.35-1.84). Conclusions: In this small retrospective study of tRCC, IO+IO therapy produced modest activity based on low ORR and short PFS while IO+VEGF TT produced numerically higher ORR and longer PFS. Insights into the biological basis of tRCC are necessary to develop more effective therapies for this rare and aggressive RCC variant.

Outcomes (%)
IO+VEGF TT*(N=11)
IO+IO** (N=18)
All (N=29)
P value
Objective response rate
4 (36)
1 (5.5)
5 (17)
0.05
Partial response
4 (36)
1 (5.5)
5 (17)

Stable disease
1 (9)
3 (17)
4 (14)

Progressive disease
6 (54)
14 (78)
20 (69)

Median PFS, mo
5.36
2.83
3.22
0.62, HR=0.81 (0.35-1.84)
Median OS, mo
13.71
13.47
13.5
0.88, HR=0.93 (0.33-2.59)

*avelumab/axitinib (n=2), nivolumab/cabozantinib (n=4), pembrolizumab/axitinib (n=2), atezolizumab/bevacizumab (n=2), nivolumab/axitinib (n=1) **nivolumab/ipilimumab (n=17) and durvalumab/tremelimumab (n=1)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr 343)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.343

Abstract #

343

Poster Bd #

F11

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Nicole Conci

First Author: Bradley Alexander McGregor

First Author: Scott N. Gettinger