The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Omar Alhalabi , Jonathan Thouvenin , Sylvie Negrier , Yann-Alexandre Vano , Luca Campedel Jr., Elshad Hasanov , Ziad Bakouny , Andrew Warren Hahn , Mehmet Asim Bilen , Toni K. Choueiri , Srinivas Raghavan Viswanathan , Kanishka Sircar , Laurence Albiges , Gabriel Malouf , Nizar M. Tannir
Background: IO combinations are standard of care for first-line therapy of clear-cell RCC; however, non-clear cell histologies including tRCC were not included in the registrational trials. We previously reported a modest efficacy (objective response rate [ORR] <20%) with IO monotherapy (PD-1 blockade) in tRCC (Boilève et al, JITC. 2018). The efficacy of IO combinations +/- VEGF TT has not been reported. Methods: This is a retrospective, international, multicenter study of pts with tRCC treated with IO-IO or IO+VEGF TT at 11 centers in the US, France, and Belgium. Only pts with confirmed TFE3 or TFEB translocation by fluorescent-in-situ hybridization (FISH) were included. ORR and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by RECIST. Overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier methods. OS was measured from initiation of therapy till death or last follow up. We also assessed the association between OS and baseline prognostic variables. Results: 29 patients with metastatic tRCC were included in this analysis. Median age at starting therapy was 38 (IQR 27, 53) years. Female:Male ratio was 0.9:1. FISH revealed a translocation involving TFE3 and TFEB in 22 and 7 patients, respectively. Most frequent metastatic sites at diagnosis were lungs (76%), liver (52%), retroperitoneal adenopathy (48%), and bone (38%). IMDC risk at diagnosis was favorable (31%), intermediate (45%) and poor (24%). Combinations of IO+VEGF TT and anti-PD1 (L1) + anti-CTLA-4 (IO+IO) were used in 11 and 18 pts, respectively. 17 (59%) pts received IO combinations as 1L, 7 (24%) pts as 2L and 5 (17%) pts as ≥3L. ORR in the IO+IO group was 1/18 (5.5%), while in IO+VEGF TT group was 4/11 (36%). For 20 (69%) pts, progressive disease was the best overall response. At a median follow-up of 12.9 months (mo), median PFS was 3.2 mo and median OS was 13.5 mo for all 29 pts (Table). Median PFS in the IO+IO group was 2.8 mo, and 5.4 mo in IO+VEGF TT group (HR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.35-1.84). Conclusions: In this small retrospective study of tRCC, IO+IO therapy produced modest activity based on low ORR and short PFS while IO+VEGF TT produced numerically higher ORR and longer PFS. Insights into the biological basis of tRCC are necessary to develop more effective therapies for this rare and aggressive RCC variant.
Outcomes (%) | IO+VEGF TT*(N=11) | IO+IO** (N=18) | All (N=29) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Objective response rate | 4 (36) | 1 (5.5) | 5 (17) | 0.05 |
Partial response | 4 (36) | 1 (5.5) | 5 (17) | |
Stable disease | 1 (9) | 3 (17) | 4 (14) | |
Progressive disease | 6 (54) | 14 (78) | 20 (69) | |
Median PFS, mo | 5.36 | 2.83 | 3.22 | 0.62, HR=0.81 (0.35-1.84) |
Median OS, mo | 13.71 | 13.47 | 13.5 | 0.88, HR=0.93 (0.33-2.59) |
*avelumab/axitinib (n=2), nivolumab/cabozantinib (n=4), pembrolizumab/axitinib (n=2), atezolizumab/bevacizumab (n=2), nivolumab/axitinib (n=1) **nivolumab/ipilimumab (n=17) and durvalumab/tremelimumab (n=1)
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2024 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Viktor Grünwald
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Nicole Conci
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Bradley Alexander McGregor
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Scott N. Gettinger