SWOG S1314: A randomized phase II study of co-expression extrapolation (COXEN) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized, muscle-invasive bladder cancer with overall survival follow up.

Authors

Thomas W. Flaig

Thomas W. Flaig

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO

Thomas W. Flaig , Catherine Tangen , Siamak Daneshmand , Ajjai Shivaram Alva , M. Scott Lucia , David McConkey , Dan Theodorescu , Amir Goldkorn , Matthew I. Milowsky , Rick Bangs , Gary R. MacVicar , Bruno R. Bastos , Jared Fowles , Daniel Gustafson , Melissa Plets , Ian Murchie Thompson Jr., Seth P. Lerner

Organizations

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, Johns Hopkins University Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA, Charlottesville, VA, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine and Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network, Bethesda, MD, Illinois CancerCare PC, Peoria, IL, Cleveland Clinic, Weston, FL, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, Christus Santa Rosa Medical Center Hospital, Houson, TX, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: This trial evaluated COXEN, a gene expression model, as a predictive biomarker in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BC) patients randomized to Gemcitabine-Cisplatin (GC) or dose-dense Methotrexate-Vinblastine-Adriamycin/doxorubicin-Cisplatin (ddMVAC). Primary results correlating COXEN with pathologic response at surgery have been reported. This secondary analysis includes progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Eligibility included Stage cT2-T4a N0 M0, urothelial BC (mixed histology allowed), ≥ 5 mm of viable tumor, cisplatin eligible, with plan for cystectomy. 237 patients were randomized between ddMVAC, given every 14 days for 4 cycles, and GC, given every 21 days for 4 cycles. Cox regression was used to evaluate COXEN score or treatment arm association with PFS and OS, adjusting for stratification factors (stage and PS). Results: 167 patients were included in the primary COXEN analysis all having either at least 3 cycles of chemo and surgery within 100 days of last chemo or having progressed while receiving chemo. The COXEN scores were not significantly prognostic for OS or PFS in their respective arms; the COXEN GC score was a significant predictor for OS in pooled arms. OS and PFS data are shown for both scores in the table. In the intent to treat analysis (n=227), there was no significant difference in OS or PFS for ddMVAC versus GC (for OS, HR =0.87, 95% CI 0.54-1.40), p = 0.57); for PFS (HR= 0.76 95% CI 0.58-1.01, p = 0.055). Association of path response with OS will be presented. Conclusions: The COXEN GC score may be prognostic of survival in those receiving platinum-based neoadjuvant treatment. The randomized, prospective design provides estimates of OS and PFS for GC and ddMVAC that appear comparable, but this phase II trial is underpowered for definitive comparisons. The prospective data and correlative samples from S1314 will allow for further assessment of COXEN and other RNA and DNA based predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Clinical trial information: NCT02177695.

COXEN Score
Treatment Arm
Outcome
Sample Size
Hazard Ratio*
HR 95% CI*
2-sided p value *
GC-specific
GC
OS
82
0.33
0.10, 1.13
0.08
GC-specific
GC
PFS
82
0.45
0.17, 1.20
0.11
MVAC-specific
MVAC
OS
85
0.99
0.40, 2.45
0.98
MVAC-specific
MVAC
PFS
85
1.56
0.75, 3.27
0.23
GC-specific
Both
OS
167
0.45
0.20, 0.99
0.047
GC-specific
Both
PFS
167
0.77
0.42, 1.40
0.39

* Adjusted for two stratification factors – clinical stage at baseline (T2 vs T3, T4a), PS (0 vs 1). Funding: NIH/NCI grant U10CA180888, U10CA180819, U10CA180820, U10CA180821.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session B: Urothelial Carcinoma

Track

Urothelial Carcinoma

Sub Track

Translational Research, Tumor Biology, Biomarkers, and Pathology

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02177695

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr 536)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.536

Abstract #

536

Poster Bd #

H8

Abstract Disclosures