Characterizing IMDC prognostic groups in contemporary first-line combination therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

Authors

null

Matthew Scott Ernst

Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada

Matthew Scott Ernst , Vishal Navani , J Connor Wells , Frede Donskov , Naveen S. Basappa , Chris Labaki , Sumanta K. Pal , Luis A Meza , Lori Wood , D. Scott Ernst , Bernadett Szabados , Rana R. McKay , Francis Parnis , Cristina Suárez , Takeshi Yuasa , Anil Kapoor , Ajjai Shivaram Alva , Georg A. Bjarnason , Toni K. Choueiri , Daniel Yick Chin Heng

Organizations

Tom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, The Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre and University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, Barts Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, Ashford Cancer Center, Adelaide, Australia, Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Hospital Universitari Vall d´Hebron, Vall d´Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada, Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Research Funding

No funding received

Background: The combination of immuno-oncology agents (IO) ipilimumab and nivolumab (IPI-NIVO) and combinations of IO with vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies (IOVE) have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials for the first-line treatment of mRCC. This study seeks to establish real-world clinical benchmarks based on the International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) criteria using vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy (VEGF-TT) treated patients for context. Methods: The IMDC database (IMDConline.com) was used to identify patients with mRCC who received first-line IPI-NIVO, IOVE (axitinib/pembrolizumab, lenvatinib/pembrolizumab, cabozantinib/nivolumab, or axitinib/avelumab) and VEGF-TT (sunitinib or pazopanib) from 2002-2021. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and was calculated from time of initiation of first-line therapy to death or last follow up. Log-rank tests were conducted to compare favorable, intermediate, and poor risk OS outcomes within treatment groups. Overall response rates (ORR) and complete response (CR) rates were calculated based on physician assessment of best clinical response. Results: In total, 692 patients received IPI-NIVO, 244 received IOVE, and 7152 received VEGF-TT. Baseline characteristics for IPI-NIVO, IOVE, and VEGF-TT, respectively, were as follows: median age (interquartile range) 63 (56-69), 64 (57-70), and 63 (56-70); male 72%, 74%, and 72% (p=0.74); non-clear cell histology 15%, 10%, and 13% (p=0.15); sarcomatoid features 24%, 15%, and 13% (p<0.0001); brain metastasis 8%, 4%, and 8% (p=0.04); liver metastasis 18%, 14%, and 18% (p=0.17); underwent nephrectomy 61%, 79% and 80% (p<0.0001). OS and ORR are reported in the table. P-values (log rank) for OS between risk groups were significant for IPI-NIVO (p<0.0001), IOVE (p=0.0005), and VEGF-TT (p<0.0001). Conclusions: These findings provide real-world survival and response benchmarks for contemporary first-line mRCC treatments and could be helpful for patient counselling. In addition, these findings mirror the efficacy of combination therapies established in clinical trials against VEGF-TT monotherapy. IMDC criteria continue to risk stratify patients in these novel combination therapies.


IPI-NIVO n=692
IOVE n=244
VEGF-TT n=7152
IMDC Risk
Favorable*
Intermediate
Poor
Favorable
Intermediate
Poor
Favorable
Intermediate
Poor
n

(%)
66

(10)
399

(58)
227

(33)
81

(33)
117

(48)
46

(19)
1290

(18)
3977

(56)
1185

(17)
12-month OS
94%
84%
60%
98%
91%
82%
92%
75%
38%
18-month OS
90%
77%
49%
94%
85%
75%
84%
64%
28%
CR (%)
4/55

(7)
16/342

(5)
4/186

(2)
5/72

(7)
4/100

(4)
0/39

(0)
39/1160

(3)
121/3446

(4)
23/1529

(2)
ORR (%)
24/55

(44)
139/342

(41)
61/186

(33)
44/72

(61)
59/100

(59)
17/39

(44)
456/1160

(39)
1156/3446

(34)
320/1529

(21)

*IPI-NIVO is not indicated in favorable risk patients and must be interpreted with caution.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Renal Cell Cancer; Adrenal, Penile, Urethral, and Testicular Cancers

Track

Renal Cell Cancer,Adrenal Cancer,Penile Cancer,Testicular Cancer,Urethral Cancer

Sub Track

Quality of Care/Quality Improvement and Real-World Evidence

Citation

J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 6; abstr 308)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.308

Abstract #

308

Poster Bd #

D11

Abstract Disclosures