Association of multiplex-immunofluorescence (m-IF) and gene expression signature with prognosis and bevacizumab (bev) treatment outcomes in NRG oncology/NSABP C-08: Implications for combining immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and bev.

Authors

null

Katherine L. Pogue-Geile

NSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA

Katherine L. Pogue-Geile , Marion E Joy , Ying Wang , Rim S Kim , Patrick G Gavin , Debora Fumagalli , Greg Yothers , Carmen Joseph Allegra , Ashok Srinivasan , Melanie Finnigan , Samuel A. Jacobs , Thomas J. George , Jennifer Marie Suga , Judith O. Hopkins , Naoyuki G. Saito , Norman Wolmark , Soonmyung Paik , Peter C. Lucas

Organizations

NSABP/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, PA, NSABP/NRG Oncology/AstraZeneca (current), Gaithersburg, MD, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Womens Hospital Pulmonary Division, Boston, MA, NSABP/NRG Oncology/Breast International Group, Brussels, Belgium, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and The University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, The University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and The University of Florida/UF Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and Kaiser Permanente NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Vallejo, CA, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and Novant Helath Forsyth Medical Cancer Institute/Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Kernersville, NC, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and The Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and The UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and the Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and The UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA

Research Funding

U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: NRG Oncology/NSABP C-08 tested the efficacy of adding bev to mFOLFOX in patients (pts) with stage II or III colon cancer. In an unplanned analysis we showed that MMR status was predictive of bev benefit with dMMR pts receiving statistically significant bev benefit. More recently, we showed that immune cells and immune checkpoint proteins have differential effects on prognosis and bev benefit in C-08 (ASC0 2021). As part of a preplanned secondary objective of an NCTN-CCSC approved protocol, we tested the association of VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31, with clinical outcomes and treatment benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts enrolled in C-08. To determine what subset of pts within C-08 received bev benefit, we tested the 10-gene IFNɣ signature (Ayers et al 2017), which has been shown to associate with response to ICB in other studies. Methods: VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31 were quantitated in tumors from C-08 pts (N=1,485) using m-IF and the Vectra Pathology System and inForm software. Gene expression data of C-08 (n=387) via DASLR microarrays was used to test the IFNɣ signature for association with bev benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts. All markers were tested for associations with prognosis and bev benefit in dMMR and pMMR pts using recurrence-free interval, median cut points, and Cox models. Results: VEGFR, VEGFA, and CD31 were not prognostic in the total C-08 cohort nor in dMMR or pMMR subsets. However, high VEGFR was associated with bev benefit in dMMR pts p=0.0012, HR=0.08 [95% CI; 0.025-0.224], n=117) but not in pts with pMMR (n=555) (int p=0.03). Pts whose tumors showed higher expression of the IFNɣ signature had a better prognosis than did pts with a low signature. Importantly, in the entire C-08 cohort with available DASL data, pts with low IFNɣ signatures received bev benefit (p=0.034, HR=0.59 [95% CI: 0.36-0.97], n=211). When low IFNɣ tumors were further split by MMR status both dMMR and pMMR pts showed a trend to receive bev benefit, however, numbers of pts were too small to make firm conclusions (dMMR no bev vs. bev p=0.02, n=11; pMMR no bev vs. bev, p=0.051, n=167). Conclusions: High VEGFR is associated with bev benefit in dMMR pts. In agreement with other studies, we observe that the IFNɣ signature is associated with a good prognosis in C-08, however, unique to this study is the observation that IFNɣ low is associated with bev benefit in the entire C-08 cohort. The association of high IFNɣ signature with ICB response seen in several other studies, plus our observation that low IFNɣ is associated with bev benefit in C-08, suggests that bev and ICB are most efficacious on different subsets of pts. Current clinical trial, GI-004, is testing the efficacy of the bev + atezolizumab combination. Examination of these markers may be informative. Support: PA DOH, U10CA-180868, -180822, -196067, Genentech, Sanofi; NSABP Clinical trial information: 00096278.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Colorectal Cancer,Anal Cancer

Sub Track

Translational Research

Clinical Trial Registration Number

00096278

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.4_suppl.140

Abstract #

140

Poster Bd #

G4

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts