Nivolumab (NIVO) + 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6)/bevacizumab (BEV) versus mFOLFOX6/BEV for first-line (1L) treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Phase 2 results from CheckMate 9X8.

Authors

null

Heinz-Josef Lenz

University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

Heinz-Josef Lenz , Aparna Raj Parikh , David R. Spigel , Allen Lee Cohn , Takayuki Yoshino , Mark D. Kochenderfer , Elena Elez , Spencer H. Shao , Dustin A. Deming , Regan C. Holdridge , Timothy Larson , Eric Chen , Amit Mahipal , Amit Mahipal , Antonio Ucar , Dana Cullen , Edwina S Baskin-Bey , Jean-Marie Ledeine , Amy Hammell , Josep Tabernero

Organizations

University of Southern California, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, Sarah Cannon Research Institute at Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, Rocky Mountain Cancer Center, Denver, CO, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan, Oncology and Hematology Associates of Southwest Virginia, Roanoke, VA, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain, Northwest Cancer Specialists, Portland, OR, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, WI, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, Minnesota Oncology Hematology, Minneapolis, MN, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada, Mayo Clinic, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Baptist Health Medical Group Oncology, Miami, FL, Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company

Background: Standard 1L therapies for mCRC include a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, and a biologic agent. NIVO may enhance antitumor activity in combination with 1L standard therapies within a subset of patients (pts) with mCRC. CheckMate 9X8 evaluated NIVO + mFOLFOX6/BEV vs mFOLFOX6/BEV in 1L mCRC (NCT03414983). Methods: Adults with previously untreated, unresectable, mCRC were randomized 2:1 to NIVO 240 mg + mFOLFOX6/BEV Q2W (NIVO + standard-of-care [SOC]) or mFOLFOX6/BEV Q2W (SOC). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: 195 pts were randomized to NIVO + SOC (n = 127) or SOC (n = 68). Median (range) follow-up was 23.7 (0–33.2) months (mo; NIVO + SOC) vs 23.2 (0–32.3) mo (SOC). Median (range) duration of therapy was 9.9 (0.1–31.8+) mo (NIVO + SOC) and 7.7 (0.1–26.7+) mo (SOC). The HR (95% CI) for PFS was 0.81 (0.53–1.23; P = 0.30), which did not meet the prespecified threshold for statistical significance (median PFS, 11.9 mo in both arms; Table). PFS rates after 12 mo were higher with NIVO + SOC vs SOC (Table). ORR was 60% (NIVO + SOC) and 46% (SOC; odds ratio 1.72 [95% CI 0.96–3.10]) and median (95% CI) DOR was 12.9 (9.0–13.1) mo (NIVO + SOC) and 9.3 (7.5–11.3) mo (SOC; Table). Rates of grade 3−4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were higher with NIVO + SOC; however, no new safety signals were identified (Table). Biomarker analyses, including tumor mutational burden and baseline CD8 levels, will be presented. Conclusions: The primary endpoint of PFS was not met; however, NIVO + SOC showed higher PFS rates after 12 mo, a higher response rate, and more durable responses compared with SOC, along with acceptable safety, in 1L mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03414983.

Efficacy
NIVO + SOC

n = 127
SOC

n = 68
PFSa

Median, mo (95% CI)

HR vs SOC (95% CI; P value)

15-mo rate, % (95% CI)

18-mo rate, % (95% CI)

11.9 (8.9–15.7)

0.81 (0.53–1.23; P = 0.30)

45 (35.4–54.8)

28 (19.0–38.4)

11.9 (10.1–12.2)



21.5 (9.7–36.4)

9 (2.4–21.8)
ORR,a n (%)
76 (60)
31 (46)
DCR,a n (%)
115 (91)
57 (84)
Median TTR,a,b mo (range)
2.8 (1.5–12.2)
2.8 (1.8–8.3)
DOR,a,b

Median, mo (95% CI)

≥ 12-mo rate, % (95% CI)

≥ 18-mo rate, % (95% CI)

12.9 (9.0–13.1)

52 (39–64)

29 (17–42)

9.3 (7.5–11.3)

31 (14–50)

0 (NE)
Median OS,c mo (95% CI)
29.2 (24.0–NE)
Not reached (24.4–NE)
Safety
n = 123
n = 62
Any-grade/grade 3−4 TRAEs, n (%)
120 (98)/92 (75)
60 (97)d/30 (48)
Any-grade/grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation, n (%)
70 (57)/31 (25)
22 (35)d/6 (10)

aBICR; bResponders only (NIVO + SOC, n = 76; SOC, n = 31); cMinimum follow-up for OS, 21.5 mo; dOne grade 5 event. NE, not estimable.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2022 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Oral Abstract Session C: Cancers of the Colon, Rectum, and Anus

Track

Colorectal Cancer,Anal Cancer

Sub Track

Therapeutics

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03414983

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2022.40.4_suppl.008

Abstract #

8

Abstract Disclosures