Illness perceptions, financial toxicity, symptom burden, and survival in cancer clinical trial (CCT) participants.

Authors

null

Subha Perni

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

Subha Perni, Chukwuma Azoba, Emily Gorton, Elyse R. Park, Bruce Allan Chabner, Beverly Moy, Ryan David Nipp

Organizations

Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, St. George’s University School of Medicine, True Blue, Grenada, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

Research Funding

Other
Lazarex Cancer Foundatio, Trefler Foundation

Background: Patients’ perceptions of their illness are important for treatment decision-making and quality of life. Limited data exist describing associations of illness perceptions with other patient-centered outcomes, particularly in CCT participants. We sought to examine associations among illness perceptions and CCT patients’ financial toxicity, physical and psychological symptoms, and survival. Methods: From 7/2015-7/2017, we prospectively enrolled CCT participants who expressed interest in financial assistance programs (n = 157) and a group of patients matched by age, sex, cancer type, specific trial, and trial phase (n = 103). We assessed baseline illness perceptions (Brief Illness Perceptions Questionnaire [BIPQ] with scores > 50 indicating negative perceptions), financial toxicity (degree costs of cancer care have been a burden, moderate to catastrophic indicating financial toxicity), physical (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale [ESAS]) and psychological (Patient Health Questionnaire-4 [PHQ-4]) symptoms. We used descriptive statistics to examine associations of BIPQ and sociodemographic/clinical factors, financial toxicity, ESAS, PHQ-4, and overall survival. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate median survival times and Cox regression to assess the association of BIPQ and overall survival. Results: Among 260 patients, 189 (72.7%) completed BIPQ surveys (median age 69 [Range 26 to 83] years, 66.1% female). 68.8% had negative illness perceptions. We found no significant associations among negative illness perceptions and patients’ age, sex, race, education, marital status, performance status, insurance, cancer type, metastatic disease status, self-reported income, trial phase, trial year, or Charlson Comorbidity Index score. Patients with negative illness perceptions were more likely to report financial toxicity (69.8% vs 48.8%, p = 0.006), and had higher ESAS-total (Medians: 44 [Range 0-89] vs 21 [Range 0-78], p < 0.001), PHQ-4 depression (Medians: 2 [Range 0-6] vs 0 [Range 0-6], p < 0.001), and PHQ-4 anxiety (Medians: 3 [Range 0-6] vs 1 [Range 0-6], p < 0.001) scores. Patients with negative illness perceptions had shorter overall survival (Medians: 22 [Range 10-29] vs 42 [Range 28-Not Reached] months, log-rank p = 0.004). Adjusting for receipt of financial assistance, patients with negative illness perceptions experienced higher risk of death (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.10-2.48). Conclusions: In this prospective study of CCT participants, we found that patients with negative illness perceptions experienced greater financial toxicity, more symptom burden, and worse survival than those with more positive perceptions, despite comparable sociodemographic/clinical factors. These findings highlight the need to assess and address patients’ illness perceptions and financial burden when seeking to enhance patient-centered outcomes in oncology.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Poster Session A: Cost, Value, and Policy; Health Equity and Disparities; Patient Experience

Track

Cost, Value, and Policy,Technology and Innovation in Quality of Care,Health Care Access, Equity, and Disparities,Patient Experience,Quality, Safety, and Implementation Science

Sub Track

Communication and Shared Decision-Making Research

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 28; abstr 160)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2020.39.28_suppl.160

Abstract #

160

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Subha Perni

First Author: Subha Perni

First Author: Sienna Durbin

First Author: Sienna Durbin