Superior overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) predictions for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) using Cellworks Singula: myCare-022-03.

Authors

null

Patrick Y. Wen

Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Patrick Y. Wen , Michael Castro , Drew Watson , Shweta Kapoor , Ashish Agrawal , Aftab Alam , Kunal Ghosh Roy , Swaminathan Rajagopalan , Kabya Basu , Deepak Anil Lala , Nirjhar Mundkur , Jim Christie , Anusha Pampana , Sayani Basu , Diwyanshu Sahu , Yugandhara Narvekar , Divya Singh , Prashant Nair , Manmeet Singh Ahluwalia

Organizations

Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Personalized Cancer Medicine PLLC, Los Angeles, CA, Cell Works Group, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, Cellworks Research India, Bangalore, India, Cellworks Research India, Bangalore, CA, India, Cellworks Group, South San Francisco, CA, Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Neurological Institute, Taussig Cancer Institute and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: The Cellworks Singula Therapeutic Response Index (TRI) has been developed to assist clinicians and GBM patients in choosing between competing therapeutic options. In contrast to approaches that consider single aberrations, which often yield limited benefit, Cellworks utilizes an individual patient’s next generation sequencing results and a mechanistic multi-omics biology model, the Cellworks Omics Biology Model (CBM), to biosimulate downstream molecular effects of cell signaling, drugs, and radiation on patient-specific in silico diseased cells. For any individual patient and alternative therapy, Cellworks integrates this biologically modeled multi-omics information into a continuous Singula TRI Score, scaled from 0 (low therapeutic benefit) to 100 (high therapeutic benefit). We demonstrate that Singula is strongly associated with OS and DFS beyond standard clinical factors, including patient age, patient gender, and physician prescribed treatments (PPT). Methods: In this study, Singula’s ability to predict response was evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 100 GBM patients with OS and DFS data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, treated with PPT. As a primary analysis of the CBM and TRI Score, Cox Proportional Hazards (PH) regression and likelihood ratio (LR) tests were used to assess the hypothesis that Singula is predictive of OS and DFS above and beyond patient age, patient gender, and PPT. A p-value < 0.05 for the corresponding likelihood ratio statistic was required to be considered significant. Results: Multivariate analyses were performed to assess the performance of the Singula Therapy Response Index after adjusting for the contribution of standard clinical factors. The same Singula TRI algorithm and clinical cutoffs were used for all clinical outcome measures. These analyses, shown in the table, suggests that the proposed Singula TRI provides predictive value of OS and DFS above and beyond patient age, patient gender, and PPT. Conclusions: The Singula TRI Score provides a continuous measure scaled from 0 (low benefit) to 100 (high benefit) for alternative GBM therapeutic options. In this retrospective cohort, Singula was strongly predictive of OS and DFS and provided predictive value beyond PPT, patient age and gender. These results will be further validated in larger scale, prospectively designed clinical studies.

LR analysis for TRI.

OS
OS
OS
DFS
DFS
DFS
Test
df
χ²
p-value
df
χ²
p-value
Likelihood Ratio
1
6.2326
0.0125
1
4.9160
0.0266

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Primary CNS Tumors–Glioma

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 2017)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.2017

Abstract #

2017

Abstract Disclosures