Identifying gaps in the coverage of survivorship care services.

Authors

Anne Blaes

Anne Hudson Blaes

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Anne Hudson Blaes , Maysa M. Abu-Khalaf , Catherine M. Bender , Susan Faye Dent , Chunkit Fung , Sophia Kustas Smith , Samantha Watson , Sweatha Katta , Janette K. Merrill , Shawna V. Hudson

Organizations

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, PA, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, J.P. Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, Duke University, Durham, NC, The Samfund/Expect Miracles Foundation, Boston, MA, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ

Research Funding

Other
ASCO

Background: Despite advancements in reimbursement, anecdotal evidence suggests patients are not able to access guideline concordant survivorship care services due to a lack of coverage by payers. We present the results of a mixed methods study aimed to determine the practice-reported rates and sources of delay/denial on evidence-based, guideline concordant survivorship care services. Methods: A quantitative survey was developed by ASCO’s Cancer Survivorship Committee (CSC) to assess which services are being denied by payers for coverage/reimbursement. Questions were limited to disease sites for which practice guidelines exist. 533 ASCO members who provide survivorship care were surveyed, with a focus on obtaining representation from rural/urban, academic/private practice, pediatric/adult, and geographic location across the U.S. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted in October and November 2020 with geographic sub sample representation to further explore the nature of and extent to which coverage barriers are experienced for guideline-concordant care, specific to the provider or clinic’s primary disease site or specialty. Results: 120 responses from 50 states were included. Respondents were primarily clinicians (88%) with the majority treating patients with Medicare/Medicaid/CHIP (60%), followed by private/employer insurance (38%). There was little issue with coverage of hormone therapies. One-third reported issues some of the time with maintenance chemotherapy (38%) and immunotherapy (35%). Coverage denials for screening for recurrence for breast cancer (MRI, 63.5%), Hodgkin Lymphoma (PET/CT 47%; Breast MRI, 44.4%), and lung cancer (Low-dose CT 37.4%) were common. Half of the survey respondents reported denials for supportive care/symptom management services (Table). Private or employer-based insurance denials were most often the source of barriers (57.7%). Through interviews, denials were found to be the same across sites and not unique to a single payer or region. Most had a process to appeal denials for evidence-based services. Conclusions: Denial for survivorship care, particularly supportive care services, is common. There is a need for better advocacy with payers, improved policy, and support for providers/practices to implement protocols to obtain coverage for services, particularly in the face of burnout.

Frequencies of survivorship coverage denials (*for appropriate population).


Always
Most of the time
Neutral
Some of the time
Never
Dexa scan* (n=117)
0.9
6.0%
6.0%
44.4%
33.3%
Echocardiogram* (n=117)
0.00%
4.3%
7.7%
25.6%
52.1%
Fatigue assessment (n=118)
3.4%
17.8%
12.7%
39.8%
21.2%
Mental health services (n=117)
1.7%
11.1%
18.0%
32.5%
27.4%
Fertility services (n=117)
5.1%
18.0%
13.7%
40.2%
14.5%
Physical therapy (n=117)
1.7%
10.3%
11.1%
42.7%
29.1%
Occupational therapy (n=118)
0.9%
10.2%
16.1%
39.8%
25.4%
Dental evaluation* (n=116)
3.5%
19.0%
14.7%
31.0%
20.7%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Quality Improvement

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 6583)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.6583

Abstract #

6583

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Description of survivorship recommendations in NCCN guidelines.

First Author: Andrea Anampa-Guzmán

Abstract

2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program

Primary care provider involvement in thyroid cancer survivorship care.

First Author: Archana Radhakrishnan

Abstract

2022 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Understanding adult survivors of childhood cancers: An analysis of a survivorship transitions clinic.

First Author: Stijn Hentzen