A Phase 0 ‘trigger’ trial of CDK4/6 plus ERK1/2 inhibitors in recurrent glioblastoma.

Authors

Nader Sanai

Nader Sanai

Ivy Brain Tumor Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ

Nader Sanai , Yu-Wei Chang , Tigran Margaryan , Anita DeSantis , Mackenna Elliott , Chelsea Pennington-Krygier , Garry Hook , Wonsuk Yoo , An-Chi Tien , Artak Tovmasyan , Shwetal Mehta

Organizations

Ivy Brain Tumor Center, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, Ivy Brain Tumor Center, Phoenix, AZ

Research Funding

Other Foundation
The Ben and Catherine Ivy Foundation, Other Foundation

Background: The RB-CDK4/6 and MAPK signaling pathways are dysregulated in glioblastoma (GBM). Our recent phase 0 study of ribociclib in recurrent GBM patients suggested that CDK4/6 inhibitor monotherapy is not durable. In this ongoing, dual-drug phase 0 study (NCT04391595), we evaluate the tumor pharmacokinetics (PK) and tumor pharmacodynamics (PD) of abemaciclib, a selective CDK4/6-inhibitor, plus LY3214996, a selective ERK1/2 inhibitor, in recurrent GBM patients. Methods: Adult patients eligible for this open-label, multi-center phase 0 protocol had recurrent GBM with (1) intact RB expression, (2) >30% pERK expression, and (3) CDKN2A/B deletion or CDK4/6 amplification. Prior to a planned resection, patients received six days of abemaciclib (150mg BID) plus LY3214996 (200mg QD). In a Time-Escalation Arm, ten patients were assigned to 3-5 hour or 7-9 hour intervals from final drug dose to tumor removal. Tumor tissue (gadolinium [Gd]-enhancing and nonenhancing regions), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and plasma were collected. Total and unbound drug concentrations were measured using validated LC-MS/MS methods. Tumor PD effects, including RB and RSK phosphorylation, were compared to matched archival or pre-treatment biopsied tissue. A PK ‘trigger’ (i.e., unbound concentration > 5x biochemical IC50) was set for each drug. Gd-nonenhancing tumor tissue exhibiting abemaciclib and LY3214996 concentrations in excess of their trigger threshold qualified patients for postoperative dual-drug therapy. Results: In this interim analysis, no dose-limiting toxicities were observed. In Gd-nonenhancing tumor regions, median unbound concentrations of abemaciclib (including its equipotent M2 and M20 metabolites) were 31.2 nM (3-5 hour cohort) and 25.1 nM (7-9 hour cohort). In the same tissue, median unbound concentrations of LY3214996 were 52.0 nM (3-5 hour cohort) and 10.2 nM (7-9 hour cohort). Tumor RB and RSK phosphorylation decreased in 6/10 and 2/10 patients, respectively. Gd-enhancing tumor proliferation (MIB-1) was decreased in 8/10 patients. 5/10 patients exceeded PK thresholds for both abemaciclib (12 nM) and LY3214996 (25 nM), thereby entering the study’s therapeutic expansion phase. Conclusion: Abemaciclib and LY3214996 achieve pharmacologically-relevant concentrations in Gd-non-enhancing GBM tissue and are associated with suppression of the RB pathway and tumor proliferation. Following 6 days of presurgical drug exposure, the Optimal Time Interval (OTI) for tissue sampling was 3-5 hours after the final drug dose. Based on this interim analysis, the trial will accrue an additional 25 patients at this OTI. Clinical trial information: NCT04391595

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Oral Abstract Session

Session Title

Central Nervous System Tumors

Track

Central Nervous System Tumors

Sub Track

Primary CNS Tumors–Glioma

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT04391595

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 2005)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.2005

Abstract #

2005

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts