Northwell Health, Port Jefferson, NY
Vikas Kumar , Martin Barnes , George Calcanes , Michael Mosier , Danille Virgilio , Jeffrey L. Vacirca
Background: Unscheduled hydrations (UHs) can significantly increase the cost of care in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC or HEC). Granisetron extended-release subcutaneous injection (GERSC) is a unique formulation of granisetron for prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Limited data are available regarding the impact of GERSC on cost of UHs compared to other antiemetics. Objective: Assess costs of an UHs associated with breakthrough CINV following GERSC or palonosetron (PALO) for preventing CINV in patients receiving MEC or HEC. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records from a single multicenter community-based practice involving patients receiving MEC or HEC with a 3-drug antiemetic regimen (neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and either GERSC or PALO). Cost of care analysis for GERSC and PALO was based on maximum per-unit Medicare reimbursement for UHs, rescue antiemetic drugs and administration, laboratory, and office evaluations. Results: 182 patient records (n = 91 GERSC; n = 91 PALO) were evaluated. A lower number of median UHs per-patient were observed following GERSC versus PALO (HEC, 3 vs 5) and (MEC, 2 vs 3). Mean cost of care related to UHs was significantly lower per-patient following GERSC ($296, n=91) versus palonosetron ($837, n=91) (P< 0.0001), including when the subset analysis was restricted to those patients requiring hydration (Table).When analyzing individual components of care, hydration (CPT codes 96360 and 96361) costs per-patient receiving HEC or MEC were lower following GERSC ($62, n=91) versus PALO ($253, n=91) (P< 0.0001). Lower per-patient costs were observed following GERSC in all components of care except rescue antiemetic drug costs in MEC patients. Conclusions: GERSC reduced total per-patient costs of care associated with UHs visit relative to PALO in patients receiving HEC or MEC.
Per Patient Reimbursement Costsa ($) | Per-Patient Reimbursement Costs (only patients who required additional hydration) ($) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GERSC n = 91 | PALO n = 91 | P Valueb | GERSC n = 39 | PALO n = 72 | P Valueb | |
Unscheduled Hydration | 62 | 253 | <0.0001 | 146 | 320 | 0.0114 |
Rescue Antiemetic Admin | 49 | 140 | <0.0001 | 115 | 177 | 0.0227 |
Rescue Antiemetic Drugs | 61 | 115 | <0.0001 | 142 | 146 | 0.0953 |
Laboratory | 16 | 50 | <0.0001 | 38 | 63 | 0.0647 |
Office Eval | 108 | 279 | 0.0002 | 251 | 352 | 0.5942 |
Total | 296c | 837d | <0.0001 | 692 | 1058 | 0.0260 |
GERSC = granisetron extended-release subcutaneous injection. aValues represent the mean. bP-values are from Wilcoxon rank sum test. cThe median value for GERSC was $0. dThe median value for Palonosetron was $587.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2023 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Venkatraman Radhakrishnan
2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium
First Author: Jeffrey Vacirca
2017 Palliative and Supportive Care in Oncology Symposium
First Author: Jeffrey Vacirca
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Camilla Vieira de Reboucas