Granisetron extended-release subcutaneous injection versus palonosetron infusion for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: A cost analysis.

Authors

null

Vikas Kumar

Northwell Health, Port Jefferson, NY

Vikas Kumar , Martin Barnes , George Calcanes , Michael Mosier , Danille Virgilio , Jeffrey L. Vacirca

Organizations

Northwell Health, Port Jefferson, NY, New York Cancer & Blood Specialists, East Setauket, NY, EMB Statistical Solutions, LLC., Overland Park, KS, New York Cancer & Blood Specialists, Port Jefferson Station , NY, New York Cancer and Blood Specialists, East Setauket, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Heron Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA

Background: Unscheduled hydrations (UHs) can significantly increase the cost of care in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC or HEC). Granisetron extended-release subcutaneous injection (GERSC) is a unique formulation of granisetron for prevention of acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Limited data are available regarding the impact of GERSC on cost of UHs compared to other antiemetics. Objective: Assess costs of an UHs associated with breakthrough CINV following GERSC or palonosetron (PALO) for preventing CINV in patients receiving MEC or HEC. Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records from a single multicenter community-based practice involving patients receiving MEC or HEC with a 3-drug antiemetic regimen (neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and either GERSC or PALO). Cost of care analysis for GERSC and PALO was based on maximum per-unit Medicare reimbursement for UHs, rescue antiemetic drugs and administration, laboratory, and office evaluations. Results: 182 patient records (n = 91 GERSC; n = 91 PALO) were evaluated. A lower number of median UHs per-patient were observed following GERSC versus PALO (HEC, 3 vs 5) and (MEC, 2 vs 3). Mean cost of care related to UHs was significantly lower per-patient following GERSC ($296, n=91) versus palonosetron ($837, n=91) (P< 0.0001), including when the subset analysis was restricted to those patients requiring hydration (Table).When analyzing individual components of care, hydration (CPT codes 96360 and 96361) costs per-patient receiving HEC or MEC were lower following GERSC ($62, n=91) versus PALO ($253, n=91) (P< 0.0001). Lower per-patient costs were observed following GERSC in all components of care except rescue antiemetic drug costs in MEC patients. Conclusions: GERSC reduced total per-patient costs of care associated with UHs visit relative to PALO in patients receiving HEC or MEC.

Per-patient Reimbursement Costs by Component of Care at Time of Unscheduled Hydration.


Per Patient Reimbursement Costsa ($)
Per-Patient Reimbursement Costs (only patients who required additional hydration) ($)
GERSC

n = 91
PALO

n = 91
P Valueb
GERSC

n = 39
PALO

n = 72
P Valueb
Unscheduled Hydration
62
253
<0.0001
146
320
0.0114
Rescue Antiemetic Admin
49
140
<0.0001
115
177
0.0227
Rescue Antiemetic Drugs
61
115
<0.0001
142
146
0.0953
Laboratory
16
50
<0.0001
38
63
0.0647
Office Eval
108
279
0.0002
251
352
0.5942
Total
296c
837d
<0.0001
692
1058
0.0260

GERSC = granisetron extended-release subcutaneous injection. aValues represent the mean. bP-values are from Wilcoxon rank sum test. cThe median value for GERSC was $0. dThe median value for Palonosetron was $587.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Symptoms and Survivorship

Track

Symptom Science and Palliative Care

Sub Track

Palliative Care and Symptom Management

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e24093)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e24093

Abstract #

e24093

Abstract Disclosures