Racial and ethnic representation trends in United States oncology training programs.

Authors

null

Conner Lombardi

University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH

Conner Lombardi , Jacob Lang , Rochell Issa , Oluchi Ukaegbu Oke , Krishna Reddy , Obi Ekwenna

Organizations

University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, OH, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Utilizing race and ethnicity data from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), this study aims to assess representation trends across American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) participant specialties from the past five academic years in order to characterize current needs and effectively address these needs moving forward. Methods: Self-reported ethnicity/race data from the ACGME database books were collected from academic years 2015-16 to 2019-2020 for the following oncologic training programs: hematology and medical oncology, medical oncology, gynecologic oncology, pediatric hematology and oncology, radiation oncology, complex general surgical oncology. Summary statistics and chi-square analysis were conducted to compare underrepresented minority (URM) trends across programs. URM groups were cross-referenced with definitions provided by the AAMC and included those who identify as Hispanic, Latino or of Spanish origin, Black or African American, and Native American or Alaskan. Results: Over the study period, only 1,250 (9.0%) of 13,853 oncology trainees identified as URM. Chi-square analysis demonstrated no significant change in URM representation in all oncology specialties combined between 2015-16 and 2019-20 (8.9% [95% CI, 7.8%-10.0%] vs. 9.7% [95% CI, 8.7%-10.8%]; P=.31). Between 2015-16 and 2019-20, Hematology and oncology (+1.3%), pediatric hematology and oncology (+0.3%) all demonstrated insignificant increasing trends in representation while radiation oncology (-0.3%), complex general surgical oncology (-4.0%) had statistically insignificant decreasing trends in representation. Gynecologic oncology (+6.0%) demonstrated a significant increasing trend in representation. Conclusions: This is the first study to characterize the vast disparities in representation in oncologic training programs in the United States. There is a demonstrated lack of representation across all oncology training programs and a lack of significant improvement over the study period. A multiprong approach is needed to improve diversity and representation across the spectrum of the oncology workforce in the United States.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Access to Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 6519)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.6519

Abstract #

6519

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Representation trends in radiation oncology training programs in the United States.

First Author: Emilie Garcia

Abstract

2024 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

A multisite initiative to assess the immunization status of medical oncology patients.

First Author: Nancy Thompson