Head-to-head comparison of single agent (SA) plinabulin (Plin) versus pegfilgrastim (Peg) for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) in the phase 3 trial PROTECTIVE-1.

Authors

Douglas Blayney

Douglas W. Blayney

Stanford University, Stanford, CA

Douglas W. Blayney , Yuankai Shi , Igor Bondarenko , Stephan Ogenstad , Qingyuan Zhang , Lihua Du , Lan Huang , Ramon Mohanlal

Organizations

Stanford University, Stanford, CA, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Study on Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, Beijing, China, City Clinical Hospital No4, Dnipro, Ukraine, Statogen Consulting, LLC, Zebulon, NC, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China, BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals, Inc., New York, NY

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
BeyondSpring Pharmaceuticals,Inc.

Background: Peg is the current standard of care (SoC) for the prevention of CIN, with a low absolute neutrophil (N) count (ANC) week 1 after chemotherapy (chemo) with normalization in week 2. Breakthrough designation agent from FDA, Plin, a novel, non-G-CSF agent for the prevention of CIN, produces a normal ANC in week 1 of cycle (C) 1 by potentially protecting progenitor cells in bone marrow from chemo assault, and also has anticancer activity (Blayney, St Gallen 2019; ASCO 2019). Here we report data from a pre-specified interim analysis from PROTECTIVE-1 (Study 105; NCT03102606). Methods: Breast cancer (BC), lung (NSCLC) and prostate cancer (HRPC) pts with at least 1 risk factor as per NCCN, received docetaxel (Doc) 75 mg/m2 with either Peg 6mg (n=53) or Plin 40 mg (n=52) over 4 cycles, and had ANC blood draws on Day (D) 1, 2,6,7,8,9,10,15 in C1 (Covance Central Laboratory). Plin was given on D1, as a 30 min IV infusion, 30 min after Doc, and Peg, 24 hrs after Doc. Primary objective was to demonstrate non-inferiority (NI) of SA Plin vs SA Peg for duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in C1. NI of Plin vs Peg would be declared if the upper limit of 95% confidence interval for the mean DSN difference between Plin and Peg would be <0.65 day. Other endpoints included C1 platelet count, C1 bone pain scores (validated questionnaire), C1-4 clinical sequelae of CIN through [febrile neutropenia (FN), infection, antibiotic and hospitalization rate, and Doc discontinuation (Discont) and delays], and safety (AEs, hematology and chemistry, vital signs) Results: Predefined DSN NI criterion between SA Plin and SA Peg was met. C1 Grade 4 toxicity was not different between Plin and Peg (p=NS). Clinical sequelae of CIN were comparable or slightly better for Plin vs Peg (see Table). Plin caused less bone pain (p=0.01) and less thrombocytopenia (p<0.0001 on D15) vs Peg. AE frequency and overall safety was comparable for SA Plin and SA Peg. Conclusions: SA Plin has efficacy for Doc CIN prevention non-inferior compared to SoC Peg, and accordingly has comparable (or numerically better) profile for clinical sequelae of CIN. Plin has an advantage for bone pain, platelet counts, convenience of use (same day vs next day dosing) over SoC Peg and has anticancer activity. Clinical trial information: NCT03102606


FN
Infection
Antibiotics
Hospitalization
Doc Discont
Doc Delay
Plin (n=52)
0%
7.69%
15.4%
3.84%
13.5%
3.85%
Peg(n=53)
1.89%
15.1%
13.2%
1.89%
26.4%
5.66%

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Breast Cancer—Local/Regional/Adjuvant

Track

Breast Cancer

Sub Track

Adjuvant Therapy

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT03102606

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 547)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.547

Abstract #

547

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures