Real-world treatment and outcomes of frontline chemotherapy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors

Salwan Al Mutar

Salwan Al Mutar

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Salwan Al Mutar , Muhammad Shaalan Beg , Eric Hansen , Andrew J. Belli , Maegan Vaz , Sudhakar Velamoor , Ming He , Ching-Kun Wang

Organizations

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, COTA, Inc., Boston, MA

Research Funding

Other
COTA, Inc

Background: The difference between the FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) regimens’ clinical trial designs limit the ability to generate cross-study comparisons. Therefore, there is a significant need to understand the impact of various demographic and clinical characteristics on the effectiveness of these systemic therapies in the real-world treatment setting. This study seeks to compare the real-world outcomes of patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with frontline FOLFIRINOX or GnP. Methods: Patients with primary metastatic pancreatic cancer who received first-line (1L) FOLFIRINOX or GnP were identified in the COTA real-world database. The COTA database is a de-identified database of real-world data (RWD) derived from the electronic health records of healthcare providers in the United States. Real-world overall response rate (rwORR) was calculated as the proportion of patients achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate analyses utilized Cox proportional hazards. Results: The overall qualified cohort (n=236) was stratified by 1L FOLFIRINOX (n=109) or GnP (n=127). Select patient characteristics are shown in table. Patients treated with 1L FOLFIRINOX showed greater rwORR as compared to those treated with GnP (68.8% vs. 55.9%, p=0.04). Additionally, patients treated with 1L FOLFIRINOX had longer median OS (14.4 vs 11.4 mos, respectively). In univariate analysis, patients treated with GnP had a greater chance of mortality (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.8, p=0.05). This relationship strengthened in multivariate analysis (GnP treated HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.1, p=0.01). Conclusions: Due to lack of enrollment of representative patients in clinical trials and in the absence of a comparative clinical trial, real-world experience with chemotherapy regimens provide critical insights on the outcome of treatments. In our cohort, patients treated with frontline GnP had a significantly greater chance of mortality as compared to patients treated with frontline FOLFIRINOX. The FOLFIRINOX cohort also showed greater rwORR. Future research will continue to expand on treatment patterns in subsequent lines of therapy, as well as emerging therapy types, in order to better understand the optimal treatment sequence in metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Patient characteristics.

Patient Characteristics
FOLFIRINOX (n=109)
GnP (n=127)
p
Age, median (IQR)
Age at advanced diagnosis
61.0 (56.0, 68.0)
73.0 (65.0, 79.0)
<0.001
Race, n (%)
Non-white
22 (20.2)
18 (14.2)
0.47
White
84 (77.1)
105 (82.7)
Unknown
3 (2.8)
4 (3.1)
Practice Setting, n (%)
Community
47 (43.1)
71 (55.9)
0.07
ECOG, n (%)
0-1
71 (65.1)
91 (71.7)
0.51
2+
17 (15.6)
18 (14.2)
Unknown
21 (19.3)
18 (14.2)
Diabetes, n (%)
Diabetes with or without chronic complication
21 (19.3)
46 (36.2)
0.01

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Gastroesophageal, Pancreatic, and Hepatobiliary

Sub Track

Pancreatic Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e16249)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e16249

Abstract #

e16249

Abstract Disclosures