Differential impact of different TP53 gain-of-function mutations on overall survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results from a large integrated healthcare system.

Authors

Minggui Pan

Minggui Pan

Kaiser Permanente, Dept of Medical Oncology, Santa Clara, CA

Minggui Pan , Chen Jiang , Pamela Tse , Elaine Chung , Aleyda Solorzano , Wenwei Hu , Thach-Giao Truong , Amit Arora , Tilak Kumar Sundaresan , Jennifer Marie Marie Suga , Laurel A. Habel , Sachdev P. Thomas

Organizations

Kaiser Permanente, Dept of Medical Oncology, Santa Clara, CA, Kaiser Permanente, Division of Research, Oakland, CA, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, Kaiser Permanente, Dept of Medical Oncology, Vallejo, CA, Kaiser Permanente, Fremont, CA, San Francisco Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, CA, NSABP/NRG Oncology, and Kaiser Permanente NCI Community Oncology Research Program, Vallejo, CA

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: TP53 mutation is present in approximately 50% of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The spectrum of the TP53 mutations is extremely broad including approximately 80% missense mutations. Several missense mutations have been found to possess gain-of-function (GOF) properties in cell line and animal studies, however, confirmation of the concept of GOF in human malignancies is still lacking. Methods: We investigated the impact of TP53 GOF mutations in patients with metastatic CRC using the NGS data within Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), a large integrated healthcare system. Results: From November 2017 to January 2021, genomic profiling by StrataNGS was performed on 8658 patients, with 1056 patients being metastatic CRC, among whom 740 patients harbored a TP53 mutation (TP53mut) and 316 patients had wild-type TP53 (TP53wt). Ras (KRAS and NRAS) and BRAF mutation appropriately discriminated the overall survival (OS) of patient populations with either TP53wt or TP53mut, confirming the validity of our dataset. We identified seven GOF TP53 mutations (R175H, R248W, R248Q, R249S, R273H, R273L, R282W) in these CRC patients. We show that different GOF mutation differentially impacts the OS. Patients whose CRC harbored TP53mut R248W, R249S, and R282W (poor prognostic TP53mut, N = 47) had significantly worse OS versus patients whose CRC harbored TP53mut R248Q, R175H, R273H and R273L (N = 160, median OS 29.4 vs 44.2 months, HR 0.47, p = 0.007). The OS of the poor prognostic TP53mut patients was also significantly inferior compared to patients whose CRC harbored all other TP53 mutations (N = 1099, median OS 50.1 months, HR 0.55, p = 0.01) or TP53wt (N = 316, median OS 47,5 months, HR 0.54, p = 0.01). The demographics and the percent of Ras, BRAF, and PI3KCA mutations were similar except that the patients with the poor prognostic TP53mut had significantly higher percent of Ras mutation compared to the rest of the GOF TP53mut patients (p = 0.035). When compared to R248Q alone, R248W confers worse OS (median OS 36.3 vs 63.2 months, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Our data suggest that different TP53 GOF mutations are associated with very different clinical outcomes. Additional studies identifying specific TP53 GOF mutations that impact outcomes may provide further insight for drug development and clinical trial design.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Track

Gastrointestinal Cancer—Colorectal and Anal

Sub Track

Colorectal Cancer–Advanced Disease

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 3585)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.3585

Abstract #

3585

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2023 ASCO Annual Meeting

Relations between mutant KRAS and TP53 subtypes and other co-mutations in pancreatic cancer.

First Author: Soniya Abraham

First Author: Chongkai Wang

First Author: Takeshi Yamada

First Author: Yongjun Cha