Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer in the South African public healthcare setting.

Authors

null

Yoanna S Pumpalova

Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

Yoanna S Pumpalova , Alexandra M. Rogers , Sarah Xinhui Tan , Candice-Lee Herbst , Paul Ruff , Alfred I. Neugut , Chin Hur

Organizations

Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa, University of Witwatersrand Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa, Columbia University Herbert Irving Comprehensive Caner Center, New York, NY, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Colon cancer incidence and mortality rates are increasing in low- and middle-income countries, such as South Africa (SA). Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection for stage III colon cancer prolongs overall survival, but it is unclear which regimen is most cost-effective in resource-constrained settings, such as the SA public healthcare system. Methods: A decision-analytic Markov model was developed to compare lifetime costs and health outcomes for 60-year-old stage III colon cancer patients treated with six adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in a public hospital in SA: fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) for 3 and 6 months, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for 3 and 6 months, capecitabine for 6 months, and fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo regimen) for 6 months. Transition probabilities were derived from clinical trials to estimate risks of toxicity, disease recurrence, and survival. Costs from a SA societal perspective and utility estimates were obtained from literature and local expert opinion. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in international dollars (I$) per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted, with a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of one times the 2020 GDP per capita of SA (I$13,006.57; ZAR89,225). Results: Our model found CAPOX for 3 months to be the most cost-effective strategy, at a lifetime cost below the local WTP threshold (I$5,380.82; ZAR36,912.44) and 5.74 DALYs averted, compared to no chemotherapy. FOLFOX for 6 months was also on the efficiency frontier, with a higher total cost (I$22,747.47; ZAR156,047.64) and 0.18 additional DALYs averted (ICER = I$99,021.35/DALY averted). All other strategies were absolutely dominated. One-way sensitivity analyses found that FOLFOX for 6 months is optimal when the administration cost (i.e.: port and pump) falls to 20% of the base case price. Conclusions: In the SA public healthcare system, CAPOX for 3 months is the most cost-effective adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer. FOLFOX for 6 months, with a greater effectiveness, may be cost-effective if the administration cost decreases significantly. The optimal strategy in other settings may vary according to the local WTP threshold.

Base Case Estimates of Cost-Effectiveness.

Strategy
Cost (ZAR)
Cost (I$a)
DALYsaverted
Incremental DALYs averted
ICERb
CAPOX

3 months
36,912.44
5,380.82
5.74
--
--
Capecitabine

6 months
38,930.91
5,675.06
4.27
-1.47
Dominated
CAPOX

6 months
46,877.88
6,833.51
5.48
-0.25
Dominated
5-FU+ LV

6 months
50,121.30
7,306.31
2.65
-3.09
Dominated
No Adjuvant Chemotherapy
68,318.91
9,959.03
0.00
-5.74
Dominated
FOLFOX

3 months
87,924.94
12,817.05
5.16
-0.57
Dominated
FOLFOX

6 months
156,047.64
22,747.47
5.91
0.18
99,021.35

aI$1.00 = ZAR6.86 (estimated 2020 Purchasing Power Parity for SA). bIn I$ per DALY averted relative to the optimal strategy.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Value/Cost of Care

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e18849)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e18849

Abstract #

e18849

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts