Prognostic factors of overall (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in remission after intensive chemotherapy (IC): Multivariate analyses from the QUAZAR AML-001 trial of oral azacitidine (Oral-AZA).

Authors

Gail Roboz

Gail J. Roboz

Weill Cornell Medicine and The New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY

Gail J. Roboz , Andrew H. Wei , Farhad Ravandi , Christopher Pocock , Pau Montesinos , Hervé Dombret , Kimmo Porkka , Ignazia La Torre , Barry Skikne , Barry Skikne , Jianhua Zhong , Keshava Kumar , C. L. Beach , Hartmut Dohner

Organizations

Weill Cornell Medicine and The New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, The Alfred Hospital and Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, Kent & Canterbury Hospital, Canterbury, United Kingdom, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) and Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France, HUS Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hematology Research Unit Helsinki and iCAN Digital Precision Cancer Center Medicine Flagship, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, Celgene, a Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Boudry, Switzerland, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
Bristol Myers Squibb

Background: Demographic and disease factors influence outcomes for patients (pts) with AML. In the phase 3 QUAZAR AML-001 trial, Oral-AZA significantly prolonged OS and RFS vs. placebo (PBO) for pts with AML in first remission after IC (Wei, NEJM, 2020). Univariate analyses showed OS and RFS benefits with Oral-AZA vs. PBO across pt subgroups defined by baseline (BL) characteristics. MV analyses were performed to identify BL characteristics independently predictive of OS/RFS in QUAZAR AML-001, and to assess Tx effects of Oral-AZA vs. PBO on survival when adjusted for BL factors. Methods: Pts were aged ≥55 yrs with AML in complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) after induction ± consolidation. Within 4 months of CR/CRi, pts were randomized 1:1 to receive Oral-AZA 300 mg or PBO for 14d/28d cycle. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate Tx effects of Oral-AZA vs. PBO on OS and RFS, adjusting for BL age, sex, ECOG PS score, cytogenetic risk at diagnosis (Dx), prior MDS, geographic region, CR/CRi after induction (per investigator) and at BL (per sponsor), MRD status, receipt of consolidation, number of consolidation cycles, platelet count, and ANC. In a stepwise procedure, randomized Tx and BL variables were selected incrementally into a Cox model if P≤ 0.25. After each addition, the contribution of the covariate adjusted for other covariates in the model was evaluated and retained in the model if P≤ 0.15. Results: Oral-AZA Tx remained a significant independent predictor of improved OS (HR 0.70) and RFS (HR 0.57) vs. PBO after controlling for BL characteristics (Table). MRD status, cytogenetic risk, and pt age were each also independently predictive of OS and RFS. Response after induction (CR vs. CRi) and BL ANC were predictive of OS but not RFS, whereas prior MDS, CR/CRi at BL, and number of consolidation cycles were only predictive of RFS. Conclusions: Tx with Oral-AZA reduced the risk of death by 30% and risk of relapse by 43% vs. PBO independent of BL characteristics. Cytogenetic risk at Dx, MRD status, and pt age also independently predicted survival outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT01757535

Variable
OS

HR [95%CI]
P value
RFS

HR [95%CI]
P value
CC-486 vs PBO
0.70 [0.56, 0.88] 0.0017
0.57 [0.45, 0.70 <0.0001
MRD– vs MRD+ at BL
0.54 [0.43, 0.67]
<0.0001
0.49 [0.39, 0.61]
<0.0001
Int. vs Poor cytogenetic risk at Dx
0.57 [0.42, 0.76]
0.0002
0.49 [0.36, 0.66]
<0.0001
Age (continuous)
1.03 [1.01, 1.05]
0.0046
1.02 [1.00, 1.04]
0.0468
ANC (continuous)
1.25 [1.03, 1.50]
0.0202
NIFM
Prior MDS (Y vs N)
NIFM
1.60 [1.11, 2.30]
0.0116
CR vs CRi after induction
0.80 [0.60, 1.06]
0.1138
NIFM
non-CR/CRi vs CRi at BL
NIFM
0.39 [0.18, 0.87]
0.0216
0 vs 2 consolidation cycles
NIFM
1.28 [0.92, 1.78]
0.1355
1 vs 2 consolidation cycles
NIFM
1.35 [1.04, 1.89]
0.0224

NIFM, not in final MV model.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Discussion Session

Session Title

Hematologic Malignancies—Leukemia, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, and Allotransplant

Track

Hematologic Malignancies

Sub Track

Acute Leukemia

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT01757535

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 7014)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.7014

Abstract #

7014

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

First Author: Ahmed Bilal Khalid

Abstract

2024 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium

Association of intensifying supportive care with improved survival in patients with gastric cancer with malignant ascites.

First Author: John D Karalis