Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in advanced sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC): A multicenter study.

Authors

null

Dharmesh Gopalakrishnan

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY

Dharmesh Gopalakrishnan , Katharine Collier , Joseph J Park , Jacob P Zaemes , Elaine Tat Lam , Sabah Alaklabi , Ellen Jaeger , Rahul Atul Parikh , Pedro C. Barata , Eric Kauffman , Michael B. Atkins , Ajjai Shivaram Alva , Yuanquan Yang , Saby George

Organizations

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, University of Colorado Cancer Center, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, University of Kansas Medical Center, Westwood, KS, Tulane Cancer Center, New Orleans, LA, Urology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI, The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

Research Funding

No funding received
None

Background: Advanced sRCC is an aggressive disease with limited responsiveness to chemotherapy and VEGF-targeted therapies. Subgroup analyses from randomized trials showed improved outcomes with ICI, though sample sizes were relatively small. Methods: We conducted a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of consecutive patients (pts) who had RCC with any sarcomatoid component and received systemic therapy for advanced disease. The pts were classified into ICI+ and ICI- groups (gp) based on whether they had received ICI in any treatment line. Overall survival (OS) was measured from the initiation of first systemic therapy. Time to ICI failure (TIF) was defined as the interval from initiation of ICI to subsequent therapy or death. Survival distributions were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between covariates and survival was analyzed using multivariate Cox regression. Two-tailed P< 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 203 pts from 6 US academic cancer centers met the inclusion criteria – 155 in ICI+ gp and 48 in ICI- gp. Overall, 137 (67%) pts were male and 181 (89%) were white; median age at mRCC diagnosis was 59.7 (IQR 52.4-67.7) years; 129 (63%) pts presented de novo with distant metastases, 154 (76%) had clear cell (CC) histology, and 182 (90%) had intermediate/poor risk by IMDC criteria. ICI+ had a higher proportion of purely CC tumors (81% vs 64%, P =.02); other demographic and clinical features were similar between the two gps. After a median follow-up of 48.1 (95% CI 40.7-55.5) months (mos), median OS and response rates were significantly higher in the ICI+ gp (Table). OS benefit, compared to ICI-, was maintained in pts who received ICI in ≥ second line (39.6 vs 7.6 mos, HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.22-0.51, log-rank P<.001). TIF was comparable between pts treated with ICI upfront vs in ≥ second line (6.0 vs 5.3 mos, HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.87-1.85, P =.21). On multivariate analysis, ICI- (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.61-3.88, P<.001), non-CC histology (HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.98-5.00, P<.001) and sarcomatoid component ≥20% (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.28-2.90, P =.002) were predictive of all-cause mortality. Among pts with non-CC or mixed histology (n=45), ICI+ had higher OS (18.0 vs 5.5 mos, HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09-0.44, P<.001) and ORR (44% vs 12%, P =.03), compared to ICI-. Conclusions: Treatment with ICI led to markedly higher survival and response rates in advanced sRCC. OS benefit was maintained with ICI in the second line and beyond. Significant benefit was also noted among pts with non-CC or mixed histology sRCC.


ICI+ (n = 155)
ICI- (n = 48)
P value/ HR (95% CI)
Median OS, mos (95% CI)
31.0 (21.5-40.5)
7.6 (5.5-9.7)
HR 0.40 (0.27-0.58), P<.001
Median RCC-specific survival,  mos (95% CI)
37.8 (25.0-50.6)
7.6 (5.5-9.7)
HR 0.38 (0.25-0.58), P<.001
Complete response, %
12.0*
4.3
.009
Overall response rate (ORR), %
43.0*
19.6
.004
Disease control rate, %
66.2*
39.1
.001

*Best response to ICI, best response to non-ICI in any line.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Kidney and Bladder

Sub Track

Kidney Cancer

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 4568)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.4568

Abstract #

4568

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts