European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS and University of Milano, Milan, Italy
Giuseppe Curigliano , Justin F. Gainor , Frank Griesinger , Michael Thomas , Vivek Subbiah , Christina S Baik , Daniel Shao-Weng Tan , Dae Ho Lee , Daniel Misch , Elena Garralda , Dong-Wan Kim , Luis G. Paz-Ares , Julien Mazieres , Stephen V. Liu , Gregory Peter Kalemkerian , Yariv Houvras , Daniel W. Bowles , Aaron Scott Mansfield , Alena Zalutskaya , Anthonie J. van der Wekken
Background: RET fusions are targetable oncogenic drivers in 1–2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ARROW (NCT03037385) supported the US FDA approval of pralsetinib, a highly potent oral selective RET inhibitor for RET-altered NSCLC and thyroid cancer. Here, we present updated results for a larger population of patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC enrolled in ARROW. Methods: ARROW is a phase 1/2 open-label study conducted at 84 sites in 13 countries. Phase 2 expansion cohorts included patients with RET fusion–positive NSCLC. Initially, all treatment-naïve patients were not candidates for platinum-based therapy, a requirement removed by protocol amendment in July 2019. Primary objectives are overall response rate (ORR; blinded independent central review [BICR] per RECIST v1.1), assessed for patients with baseline measurable disease, and safety. Results: Updated analyses were completed as of Nov 6, 2020 (data cut-off), for patients who initiated pralsetinib 400 mg QD by May 22, 2020 (enrollment cut-off). Efficacy results, including analyses for treatment-naïve patients enrolled after eligibility criteria were revised to allow candidates for platinum-based therapy, are shown in the Table. Conclusions: Pralsetinib showed rapid, potent, and durable clinical activity in patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC (regardless of prior therapies), including poor prognosis patients not eligible for platinum-based therapy. Overall, pralsetinib was well-tolerated. These data highlight the need for RET testing early in the course of disease to identify candidates who may benefit from treatment with pralsetinib.Clinical trial information: NCT03037385
Prior Platinuma (n = 126) | Treatment-Naïvea (n = 68) | Treatment-Naïve: Subset Enrolled After Eligibility Revisiona (n = 25) | |
---|---|---|---|
ORR, % (95% CI) | 62 (53–70) | 79 (68–88) | 88 (69–98) |
Clinical benefit rate, % (95% CI)b | 74 (65–81) | 82 (71–91) | 88 (69–98) |
Disease control rate, % (95% CI) | 91 (85–96) | 93 (84–98) | 96 (80–100) |
Median duration of response, mo (95% CI) | 22.3 (15.1–NE) | NR (9.0–NE) | NR (NE–NE) |
Median time to response, mo (95% CI) | 1.8 (1.3–11.4) | 1.8 (0.9–6.1) | 1.8 (1.7–6.1) |
Median PFS, mo (95% CI)c | 16.5 (10.5–24.1)d | 13.0 (9.1–NE)e | NR (NE–NE)f,g |
CI, confidence interval; mo, months; NE, not estimable; NR, not reached; PFS, progression-free survival. aMeasurable disease population. bConfirmed response or stable disease of ≥16 weeks. cAssessed in full efficacy population. dn = 136. en = 75. fn = 28. gMedian follow-up for PFS in this population was 8.2 mo. In all patients enrolled in ARROW who received pralsetinib 400 mg QD by May 22, 2020 irrespective of tumor type (n = 471; data cut-off Nov 6, 2020), the most common (≥25%) treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (39%), anemia (35%), increased alanine aminotransferase (27%), constipation (26%) and hypertension (25%). Overall, 6% of patients discontinued treatment due to TRAEs.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Justin F. Gainor
2021 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium
First Author: Vivek Subbiah
2022 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: Aaron Scott Mansfield
2024 ASCO Annual Meeting
First Author: JISHENG LI