The efficacy of enzalutamide (ENZA) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) on bone oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A post hoc analysis of ARCHES.

Authors

Andrew Armstrong

Andrew J. Armstrong

Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate & Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC

Andrew J. Armstrong , Taro Iguchi , Arun Azad , Arnauld Villers , Boris Alekseev , Daniel P. Petrylak , Russell Zelig Szmulewitz , Antonio Alcaraz , Neal D. Shore , Jeffrey Holzbeierlein , Francisco Gomez-Veiga , Brad Rosbrook , Fabian Zohren , Gabriel P. Haas , Georgia Gourgioti , Nader N. El-Chaar , Arnulf Stenzl

Organizations

Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate & Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan, Monash Health, Melbourne, Australia, University Hospital Centre, Lille University, Lille, France, Hertzen Moscow Cancer Research Institute, Moscow, Russian Federation, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, Carolina Urologic Research Center, Myrtle Beach, SC, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, GITUR-IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain, Pfizer Inc., San Diego, CA, Astellas Pharma Inc., Northbrook, IL, Astellas Pharma Inc., London, United Kingdom, University Hospital, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

Research Funding

Pharmaceutical/Biotech Company
This study was funded by Astellas Pharma Inc. and Pfizer Inc., the co-developers of enzalutamide. Medical writing and editorial assistance were provided by Folabomi Oladosu, PhD, and Jane Beck, MA, from Complete HealthVizion, funded by the study sponsors

Background: In ARCHES (NCT02677896), ENZA + ADT reduced the risk of radiographic progression and improved secondary clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with variable patterns of disease spread over placebo (PBO) + ADT. This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ENZA + ADT in patients with bone oligometastatic mHSPC compared to polymetastatic mHSPC in ARCHES. Methods: Patients with mHSPC (n = 1150) were randomized 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT, stratified by disease volume and prior docetaxel chemotherapy. This post hoc analysis included patients with bone metastases only, categorized as oligometastatic (1–≤5 metastases) or as polymetastatic (≥6 metastases) based on central review at screening. Efficacy outcomes were compared across treatment arms. Results: Of the ARCHES population with bone metastases (n = 512), the largest subgroup included patients with ≤5 metastases (ENZA + ADT, n = 160; PBO + ADT, n = 136). Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between treatment arms and across subgroups. When compared to PBO + ADT, ENZA + ADT improved rPFS and secondary endpoints in patients with ≤5 metastases (Table). Similar results were observed across other oligometastatic subgroups (1–≤4) as well as in polymetastatic disease (≥6). The safety profile of ENZA + ADT versus PBO + ADT was similar across subgroups and consistent with previous findings. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrates that ENZA + ADT provides clinical benefit across bone oligometastatic as well as polymetastatic mHSPC, supporting the utility of ENZA irrespective of metastatic burden in the ARCHES study. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896

Post hoc analysis of oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease.a

Endpoint,
HR (95% CI)b
1
(n = 53c;

n = 44d)
≤2
(n = 87c;

n = 76d)
≤3
(n = 120c;

n = 103d)
≤4
(n = 142c;

n = 117d)
≤5
(n = 160c;

n = 136d)
≥6
(n = 107c;

n = 109d)
rPFSe0.17
(0.02, 1.48)
0.24
(0.07, 0.87)
0.21
(0.08, 0.56)
0.16
(0.06, 0.42)
0.22
(0.10, 0.47)
0.35
(0.22, 0.57)
Time to PSA progression0.14
(0.03, 0.63)
0.09
(0.02, 0.40)
0.16
(0.06, 0.41)
0.12
(0.05, 0.31)
0.11
(0.04, 0.28)
0.13
(0.06, 0.27)
Time to castration

resistance
0.13
(0.03, 0.60)
0.15
(0.05, 0.44)
0.17
(0.07, 0.38)
0.15
(0.07, 0.33)
0.17
(0.09, 0.34)
0.27
(0.17, 0.43)
Time to initiation of new

antineoplastic therapy
0.40
(0.10, 1.60)
0.45
(0.16, 1.31)
0.40
(0.17, 0.94)
0.33
(0.14, 0.75)
0.29
(0.13, 0.66)
0.29
(0.16, 0.51)

aOligometastatic mHSPC was defined as 1–≤5 bone metastases; polymetastatic mHSPC was defined as ≥6 bone metastases; bHR < 1 favors ENZA + ADT; HR > 1 favors PBO + ADT; cNumber of patients in subgroup who received ENZA + ADT; dNumber of patients in subgroup who received PBO + ADT; eAssessed by independent central review, or death, within 24 weeks of treatment discontinuation. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Track

Genitourinary Cancer—Prostate, Testicular, and Penile

Sub Track

Prostate Cancer– Advanced/Hormone-Sensitive

Clinical Trial Registration Number

NCT02677896

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 5071)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5071

Abstract #

5071

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures