Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate & Urologic Cancers, Duke University, Durham, NC
Andrew J. Armstrong , Taro Iguchi , Arun Azad , Arnauld Villers , Boris Alekseev , Daniel P. Petrylak , Russell Zelig Szmulewitz , Antonio Alcaraz , Neal D. Shore , Jeffrey Holzbeierlein , Francisco Gomez-Veiga , Brad Rosbrook , Fabian Zohren , Gabriel P. Haas , Georgia Gourgioti , Nader N. El-Chaar , Arnulf Stenzl
Background: In ARCHES (NCT02677896), ENZA + ADT reduced the risk of radiographic progression and improved secondary clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) with variable patterns of disease spread over placebo (PBO) + ADT. This post hoc analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ENZA + ADT in patients with bone oligometastatic mHSPC compared to polymetastatic mHSPC in ARCHES. Methods: Patients with mHSPC (n = 1150) were randomized 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT, stratified by disease volume and prior docetaxel chemotherapy. This post hoc analysis included patients with bone metastases only, categorized as oligometastatic (1–≤5 metastases) or as polymetastatic (≥6 metastases) based on central review at screening. Efficacy outcomes were compared across treatment arms. Results: Of the ARCHES population with bone metastases (n = 512), the largest subgroup included patients with ≤5 metastases (ENZA + ADT, n = 160; PBO + ADT, n = 136). Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between treatment arms and across subgroups. When compared to PBO + ADT, ENZA + ADT improved rPFS and secondary endpoints in patients with ≤5 metastases (Table). Similar results were observed across other oligometastatic subgroups (1–≤4) as well as in polymetastatic disease (≥6). The safety profile of ENZA + ADT versus PBO + ADT was similar across subgroups and consistent with previous findings. Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrates that ENZA + ADT provides clinical benefit across bone oligometastatic as well as polymetastatic mHSPC, supporting the utility of ENZA irrespective of metastatic burden in the ARCHES study. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896
Endpoint, HR (95% CI)b | 1 (n = 53c; n = 44d) | ≤2 (n = 87c; n = 76d) | ≤3 (n = 120c; n = 103d) | ≤4 (n = 142c; n = 117d) | ≤5 (n = 160c; n = 136d) | ≥6 (n = 107c; n = 109d) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
rPFSe | 0.17 (0.02, 1.48) | 0.24 (0.07, 0.87) | 0.21 (0.08, 0.56) | 0.16 (0.06, 0.42) | 0.22 (0.10, 0.47) | 0.35 (0.22, 0.57) | |
Time to PSA progression | 0.14 (0.03, 0.63) | 0.09 (0.02, 0.40) | 0.16 (0.06, 0.41) | 0.12 (0.05, 0.31) | 0.11 (0.04, 0.28) | 0.13 (0.06, 0.27) | |
Time to castration resistance | 0.13 (0.03, 0.60) | 0.15 (0.05, 0.44) | 0.17 (0.07, 0.38) | 0.15 (0.07, 0.33) | 0.17 (0.09, 0.34) | 0.27 (0.17, 0.43) | |
Time to initiation of new antineoplastic therapy | 0.40 (0.10, 1.60) | 0.45 (0.16, 1.31) | 0.40 (0.17, 0.94) | 0.33 (0.14, 0.75) | 0.29 (0.13, 0.66) | 0.29 (0.16, 0.51) |
aOligometastatic mHSPC was defined as 1–≤5 bone metastases; polymetastatic mHSPC was defined as ≥6 bone metastases; bHR < 1 favors ENZA + ADT; HR > 1 favors PBO + ADT; cNumber of patients in subgroup who received ENZA + ADT; dNumber of patients in subgroup who received PBO + ADT; eAssessed by independent central review, or death, within 24 weeks of treatment discontinuation. CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.
Disclaimer
This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org
Abstract Disclosures
2020 ASCO Virtual Scientific Program
First Author: Neal D. Shore
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Arun Azad
2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Axel S. Merseburger
2021 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium
First Author: Christian Gratzke