Trajectories of machine learning-predicted mortality risk among patients with cancer and associated end-of-life utilization.

Authors

null

Manqing Liu

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Manqing Liu , Jinbo Chen , Eric Li , Runze Li , Ravi Bharat Parikh

Organizations

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, Penn State University, University Park, PA

Research Funding

Other Foundation
National Palliative Care Research Center, U.S. National Institutes of Health

Background: Machine learning (ML) algorithms outperform traditional tools used for prognostication and may facilitate earlier discussions between oncologists and patients (pts) about hospice enrollment and treatment modification. Identifying longitudinal trajectories of mortality risk may help clinicians and health systems understand which populations such algorithms are likely to benefit. Methods: We identified trajectories of mortality risk and their association with existing metrics of end-of-life care quality, using electronic health and registry data from a prospective cohort of 3,280 pts with cancer who were seen in 18 tertiary or community medical oncology practices within a large academic health system between January 2018 and May 2020 and died prior to November 2020. A validated ML algorithm (c-statistic 0.89; Parikh et al, JAMA Oncol, 2020) prospectively generated mortality risk predictions prior to all encounters. Functional principal component analysis (FPCA) identified modes of variation for all patient-level mortality risk predictions associated with encounters prior to death. Adjusted logistic regression analyses tested associations between mortality risk trajectory and metrics of high-quality end-of-life care. Results: FPCA revealed 2 trajectories that represented 36% and 64% of all pts in the cohort. The first cluster (“unpredictable”) consisted of pts whose ML-predicted mortality risk rose sharply within 30 days of death. The second cluster (“predictable”) consisted of pts whose ML-predicted mortality risk was higher at baseline and rose gradually until death. Individuals with predictable mortality risk trajectories were more likely to have worse performance status, high comorbidity burden, and gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies (Table). Predictable trajectories were associated with higher hospice enrollment (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.48-2.37), less inpatient death (aOR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.92), less end-of-life intensive care unit admissions in the last 30 days of life (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.95), and less chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life (aOR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55-1.08). Conclusions: Over one-third of deaths among pts with cancer follow an unpredictable trajectory. For pts with unpredictable trajectories, overreliance on ML predictions could perpetuate aggressive end-of-life care.

Characteristics of mortality trajectories.

Characteristics
OR†
P value
Age
< 75 (Ref)
≥ 75
0.73
<0.01
Comorbidity number
0-1 (Ref)
2
1.51
<0.01
3+
3.70
<0.01
ECOG performance status
0-1 (Ref)
2+
1.29
0.03
Cancer stage
Stage I-III (Ref)
IV
2.02
<0.01
Cancer type
Breast (Ref)
GI
1.56
0.03
Genitourinary
1.18
0.49
Gynecology
1.37
0.43
Leukemia
1.11
0.71
Lymphoma
0.63
0.06
Melanoma
0.73
0.25
Myeloma
0.54
0.01
Neuro
0.28
<0.01
Thoracic
0.87
0.50

Odds of belonging to predictable trajectory, relative to unpredictable trajectory.

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Poster Session

Session Title

Care Delivery and Regulatory Policy

Track

Care Delivery and Quality Care

Sub Track

Clinical Informatics/Advanced Algorithms/Machine Learning

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 1553)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.1553

Abstract #

1553

Poster Bd #

Online Only

Abstract Disclosures

Similar Abstracts

Abstract

2024 ASCO Quality Care Symposium

Impact of a mortality prediction tool on end-of-life (EOL) quality measures.

First Author: Jody S. Garey

First Author: Melissa R Rosen

First Author: Rushil Virendra Patel