Uptake and effectiveness of checkpoint inhibitor therapy among trial-ineligible patients with advanced solid malignancies.

Authors

Ravi Parikh

Ravi Bharat Parikh

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

Ravi Bharat Parikh , Eun Jeong Min , E. Paul Wileyto , Fauzia Riaz , Cary Philip Gross , Roger B. Cohen , Rebecca A. Hubbard , Qi Long , Ronac Mamtani

Organizations

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

Research Funding

Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
Conquer Cancer Foundation of the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are part of standard of care in many advanced solid malignancies. Patients (pts) with poor performance status or organ dysfunction have been usually ineligible in pivotal clinical trials of ICIs. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed ICI uptake and effectiveness among 34,131 pts diagnosed with advanced non-targetable non-small cell lung (NSCLC), urothelial cell (UCC), renal cell (RCC), or hepatocellular (HCC) carcinoma between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019. Pts were identified from the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database, consisting of pts receiving care in 280 mostly community oncology practices in the US. 9,318 (27.3%) pts were trial-ineligible based on ECOG performance status ≥ 2 or liver (total bilirubin ≥ 3 mg/dL) or kidney (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2) dysfunction. The association between trial-ineligibility and ICI monotherapy uptake was assessed using inverse probability weighted logistic regression. We hypothesized that there would be no differences in overall survival between ICI and non-ICI therapies in the trial-ineligible cohort. To test this hypothesis, we used inverse probability of treatment weighted survival analyses. Because we observed non-proportional hazards, we report 12- and 36-month restricted mean survival times (RMSTs) and time-varying hazard ratios < and ≥ 6 months. Results: Between 2014-2019, the proportion of pts who received ICI monotherapy rose from 0% to 30.2% among trial-ineligible pts and from 0.1% to 19.4% among trial-eligible pts. Trial-ineligible pts received ICI monotherapy more frequently than trial-eligible pts (22.5% vs 12.7%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] relative to non-ICI therapy 1.8, 95% CI 1.7-1.9). Among trial-ineligible pts, there were no OS differences between ICI monotherapy, ICI combination therapy, and non-ICI therapy at 12 months (RMST 7.8 vs. 7.7 vs. 8.1 mos) or 36 months (15.0 vs. 13.9 vs. 14.4 mos). Relative to non-ICI therapy, ICI monotherapy was associated with early mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] within 6 months 1.19) but late benefit (aHR after 6 months 0.80) in trial-ineligible pts (Table). Conclusions: Trial-ineligible pts with advanced malignancies preferentially receive first-line ICI, despite the lack of a survival benefit and possible early mortality associated with ICI use. Positive results for ICI in phase III trials may not translate to this vulnerable population.

Survival Outcomes in Trial-ineligible Pts.


ICI Monotherapy (n=1967)
ICI Combination (n=805)
Non-ICI (n=6547)
Overall Survival (95% CI)
Median OS (mos)
9.72
9.33
8.75
Hazard ratio < 6 mos
1.19 (1.11, 1.27)
1.14 (1.08, 1.22)
1.0 (ref)
Hazard ratio ≥ 6 mos
0.80 (0.74, 0.84)
1.00 (0.89, 1.13)
1.0 (ref)
RMST, mos (95% CI)
12 months
7.79 (7.66, 7.92)
7.76 (7.59, 7.89)
8.12 (7.99, 8.22)
36 months
15.0 (14.5, 15.4)
13.9 (13.1, 14.7)
14.4 (14.1, 14.8)

Disclaimer

This material on this page is ©2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology, all rights reserved. Licensing available upon request. For more information, please contact licensing@asco.org

Abstract Details

Meeting

2021 ASCO Annual Meeting

Session Type

Publication Only

Session Title

Publication Only: Health Services Research and Quality Improvement

Track

Quality Care/Health Services Research

Sub Track

Outcomes

Citation

J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr e18595)

DOI

10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e18595

Abstract #

e18595

Abstract Disclosures

Funded by Conquer Cancer